Okay, I thought I’d made myself clear but obviously not by all of the confusion I’ve caused. Let me try again. Imagine we have Townies A and B.
Townie A accused Townie B of being scum.
Townie A is killed by the Mafia.
Everyone says, “Ohnoes, Townie A was suspicious of Townie B! He must have been killed for getting too close to the truth.”
The town lynches Townie B.
Rather than getting rid of one townie, the Mafia managed to get rid of two. If the Mafia was doing what you’re suggesting, then it would look like this:
Townie A accused Townie B of being scum.
Townie B is killed by the Mafia.
Everyone: 
Sure, they might decide that Townie A is scum and was trying to get a townie lynched, but that’s an awfully complex manipulation. I see simpler, more subtle tactics like the first scenario as being more likely. I don’t think this is a strategy that’s going to be used every night, but I do think it’s one we should be wary of, which is why even if I can see some arguments against fluiddruid, I’m not willing to cast my vote in that direction right now. It just seems too close to a scum ploy.
I feel like I’m arguing myself in circles trying to look at this from every angle, though. I don’t know, I hope that at least made what I’d said before make a little more sense.
