There is absolutely no way that Rivera should get the Cy. He’s been good, but not nearly as dominating as closers of the recent past were. If he’d have had a Smoltz/Gagne type season where he chased records, I might buy it. But his ERA wasn’t off the charts good by stud closer standards. No doubt he had a great year, but he’d better be ridiculous to get the award over 2 top notch starters like Colon and Santana.
One more thing, Santana pitched 100 innings after the All-Star break to Rivera’s 78 all season, and had numbers which matched or topped every one of big Mo’s.
The AL Cy should be Santana. Since when do all the awards have to go to post-season teams? That’s just silly. I could listen to an argument for MVP based on that rationale, but not a pitcher.
The NL Cy should probably be Dontrelle. I could handle an argument for Carpenter since the two guys have very similar numbers, but I think that Dontrelle feels a little more right. I like Pettite’s resume better than Clemens, even if it’s a little unfair you need to win games. If Clemens had been pushing 300 Ks then I’d feel different, but ERA aside 13-8 just doesn’t get it done. If you argue for Clemens to win it in the NL you should be arguing for Millwood to get the AL Cy.
I’ve already made a pretty specific argument for the AL MVP here. It’s A-Rod, any rationale for Big Papi is sentimental at best.
The NL MVP is probably Pujols. It’s not Andruw for sure, his HR numbers and RBI numbers are only a bit ahead of Lee and Pujols and his rate numbers are WAY behind. The Cubs fan in me wants it to be D-Lee, but in this case when the opposition with almost identical numbers is the hub of the best team in baseball, well what can you do…
As far as the Rookies, I honestly haven’t watched the canidates enough to have an opinion. In the NL I was pretty impressed with Francoeur.
The AL Managers should be either Wedge or Guillen. I’m inclined to side with Ozzie since he is the one who made the playoffs and I think he did so with a little less raw talent and more coaching savvy. Wedge’s impressive surge can be largely attributed to young talent coming on, Ozzie turned the Sox around primarily by motivating the same talent they had last year and by changing the style of play.
In the NL I find it hard to argue against Bobby Cox, that’s just impressive. Though you could say Schuerholz should get at least as much credit, if not more. Garner did well, but I think Oswalt, Clemens, Pettite and Lidge get the lions share of the credit, they didn’t need much coaching up. Can we give Dusty Baker the award for worst manager?