When I first heard about the very real possibility of contraction a few months ago, I thought it was actually a good idea. It still is a good idea, in theory.
The talent level in the MLB has been diluted quite a bit due to the two relatively recent rounds of expansion. I believe that there probably are at least a good 80 players on big league clubs that do not have “major league” talent.
But now that some of the details are coming out as to HOW this contraction will take place, it all does seem pretty terrible.
Don’t worry. It is very, very doubtful that it will happen.
There are so many issues involved here, including what will happen to the teams minor league franchises, and so many lawsuits will be filed, I don’t think the owners honestly believe they can pull this off, especially in the four months before spring training camps open. It’s a bargaining ploy to use against the players union now that the existing agreement has expired. If they had a workable contract on the table, nobody would have even suggested this. Whether it works or not, I don’t think the teams are going anywhere.
Baseball needs a salary cap, for sure. Let’s say $90M per team per year. Of course, some teams are still going to have double the payroll of other teams, but it’s a good start. It would force the Yanks (whom I love, btw) to trim a good $25M from their ranks, and those two or three high quality players can make a big difference. Plus, when the cash flow dries up, free agent contracts will come back down to reasonable levels, allowing more teams to realistically make bids.
I’m not sure where I stand on revenue sharing. I think it’s good to a certain extent, but the league should force the teams on the receiving end to spend that money on payroll. Bring in the quality players, and the crowds will come.
If you don’t piss us all off first.
And screw Bud. How a fucking OWNER ended up as commissioner… I just don’t get it. They should dig up Judge Landis and set his skeleton down at the conference table. He’d do just as well.