MLB to shrink League?

Did I hear correctly the Major League Baseball organization has plans to remove two teams from the League instead of expanding? Why, it’s UnAmerican! :mad:

  • Jinx

it is all about money and how the small market teams cannot compete cuz the market is too small to support an overpaid team.

supposedly, with 50 players becoming free agents will also make the league more competitive.

i really doubt the deal will go thru tho.

Also seems unlikely, unless the teams themselves requested it.

Part of the reason Baseball is allowed to exist as a monopoly, IIRC, is that they pretty much have to allow any city that applies for a team to get it.

That said, there is a certain team on the North Side of Chicago that hasn’t been in the World Series since WWII and then only because they had a bunch of draft dodgers. We don’t need them, do we??? :wink:

But, I suppose a couple of teams could have said “We tried. It was a bad idea. We quit.”

Since one of the teams that’s discussed is Montreal, I guess it would be unNorth american.

The less smartass response, is yes, Bud Selig has floated the idea of shrinking the Major Leagues by probably two teams. Candidates mentioned include Montreal, Minnesota, Tampa Bay or Miami (Pittsburgh seems to have saved itself for a couple of years with its new stadium.) Reasons include:

a) Perennial lack of attendence for those franchises
b) TV revenues nowhere as good as what the NFL gets

However, remember that MLB is currently in negotiations with the players union for a new contract, and this could all be a ploy to gain leverage.

UnAmerican, yes … I’d heard that one of the teams on the potential chopping block is the Expos :D.

But will they really do it? Truth can be stranger than fiction.

Part of the reason Baseball is allowed to exist as a monopoly, IIRC, is that they pretty much have to allow any city that applies for a team to get it.


Not true at all.
St. Petersburg built a stadium and yet they failed to get a team.

I can go down the list…

I am not too sure why monopoly was granted but one of the arguments were that MLB cannot survive without one. They need to invest in minor league system…etc a lot of money to train players that may or may not succeed.

the minor league system is not profitable without mlb money.

i doubt this is the real reason, but that is from my rumor mill.

don’t forget the A’s…
Angel’s might be one too.
Kansas might too.
marlins?

Look at this article from the AP:

http://wire.ap.org/APnews/?SITE=CALOS&FRONTID=HOME
According to them “Bud Selig says it’s possible two major league teams could be eliminated by the start of next season… Some owners want to eliminate teams that are losing money and receiving a large part of the $160 million in the revenue-sharing fund this year. If owners approve, they would eliminate the Montreal Expos plus one other team, with the Florida Marlins and Minnesota Twins among the candidates mentioned most often… Owners plan to meet in Chicago the week following the World Series, and Selig said he wasn’t sure if any decisions on shrinking the league would be made then.”
Sorry for the bad news.

I don’t really want to turn this into a debate (ok, maybe I do, but…)

This is a lameass blackmail attempt by Selig and a couple of the other owners, plain and simple. Notice that the teams being discussed for elimination are only teams whose cities voted against giving them new stadiums (Oakland was on this list, too, up until they got really good and started drawing despite their crappy stadium).

Minnesota drew just fine when they were, y’know, winning, a little bit. So did Florida, although I wouldn’t really blame fans in Miami for never going to see a game again after the post-WS debacle.

Montreal, now…as far as I know, they’ve never really drawn well. But, there’s room for a team in the Northern Virginia/DC area (if they can get Peter Angelos to shut the hell up about territorial rights for 15 seconds, at least), so relocation would be a better option, there.

The other thing to consider is that all the really good blackmail spots that owners counted on to help them get new stadium deals have been filled. How long do you think it takes for Minnesota to start rumors about moving to Miami if the Marlins are folded?

[/rant]

Okay, so I’m a moron who can’t post a link correctly, but if you go to the sports section, there’s an article from 10/29 by Robert Blum titled “Selig: Team Contraction Still Viable”

Several franchises – notably Montreal – have been running in the red lately, and the idea of contraction has been mentioned from time to time the past few years (it’s not that odd a concept – the NHL had 10 teams in 1930-31, then eight the next year, and eventually only six). There is a feeling that the talent pool is spread too thin (that’s why you get 70 HRs in a season now).

Of course, the MLB Players Association won’t allow a straight contraction. However, it could be made palatable to them if teams are allowed to carry two more players on their roster.

How far down the list can you go? When you get to the part where it tells you where the Devil Rays play will you let me know?

Here’s a great article about how contraction is a bad solution to a non-existent problem. Here’s another.

Dammit.

We have a forum for the question of whether MLB should contract. This ain’t it.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sorry, manny. Those articles also offer lots of good factual information about the league’s position on contraction, the probability of contraction, and possible real-world ramifications.

adam yax,

if you are going to equate results and don’t care about the means, then The Great Gazoo is correcta and I stand corrected as far as St. Petersburg.

i was thinking of when a city finds a group of investors to start a MLB team, they will get it.

that is far from what happen at St. Petersburg. And even then, other cities got shafted.

let me give you this example, Shreveport, LA. They built a stadium too!

In a related question, what are the proposed plans for the Ottawa Lynx, Harrisburg Senators, Jupiter Hammerheads, Clinton Lumberkings, Vermont Expos, and Gulf Coast Expos, once Montreal goes under?

Will they just fold, reaffiliate with another team, or become independent?