**Einstein’s mind was only limited to science and physics, he had a limited brain
**
he did not have the capacity of the spiritual, emotional, sociological, humanities, communicative intelligence and knowledge that Malcolm x possessed
look at how elegant and clear and concise Malcolm X talks
and then look at how Einstein speaks
alot of stumbling, slow paced...etc. slower than Malcolm's speech
Make your own arguments. Use words, not YouTube videos.
I don’t see lany reason to elevate sociology and the humanities over physics. Or, for that matter the other way around. Both have their uses. But you won’t find satellites and cell phones and bridges and new energy sources being designed by English majors. I write that AS an English majort.
You realize Einstein’s first language wasn’t English, right? Anyway, elogoquence is not a good predictor of intelligence, and as I wrote labove, there is more than one sort of intelligence anyway.
Why do we have to compare them? Why can’t they both be really smart? And if we have to compare them, then why not in a more rational way – Einstein was “smarter”, perhaps, in physics and related fields, and Malcolm X was “smarter”, perhaps, in sociology and related fields?
The Hamster King asked a question. You didn’t answer it.
So do you have a video of Malcolm X speaking German? Does he stumble a lot? Does he speak German slowly? Does he speak German more slowly than Einstein spoke German?