From the Stupidest Injuries Ever Department:
One night back in the middle of August, I was sitting here at my computer, reading the Dope, eating a bowl of flavored almonds, using my left hand. I suddenly got a nasty itch in my side. I had gunk from the almonds on my thumb, index and middle fingers, and not wanting to smear it into my clothing, I jammed my left pinky into my side. There was a popping sound, but I didn’t pay it any mind until I happened to look at my hand… my pinky was bent weirdly, and I couldn’t straighten it out. There was never any pain involved.
Mallet finger: the top extensor tendon broke.
Almost nine weeks of wearing a finger splint later, this past Friday I went in to see the orthopedic specialist, who pronounced my finger healed. It’s not perfectly straight anymore, but apparently that’s just the way this kind of injury heals.
The doctor told me I now need to “wean myself off of the splint.” When he took it off on Friday, he told me to put it back on after an hour. Then take it off for two hours on Saturday, three on Sunday, and so on. After 24 days, it comes off the final time.
I didn’t think to ask the doctor, so now I’m asking here: why? What is the purpose of doing this?
Because I wasn’t bending my finger at all for almost nine weeks, the other tendon, on the bottom of the finger, wasn’t being used, and has now deteriorated a bit. I can’t bend my finger very well when the splint is off. So I need to exercise my finger to build strength back into the tendon, and gain my motion back.
But if I’m still wearing the splint a good deal of the time, isn’t that counter-productive?
I’d like to point out that I am following the doctor’s instructions, and I intend to keep following them. I am not looking for justification to abandon the “weaning period.” I’m just curious about the reasoning for it.