Judging from the pic of the extracted eel in the OP’s article and knowing its length was 65 cm, it surely must have been 10 cm in circumference, not 10 cm in diameter.
Agreed. That was also clarified by another poster upthread from another cite where the article helpfully included that magic word “circumference”. My bad to assume diameter.
10cm circumference is, dare I say it, a much more rectally compatible cross-section. Shame about the teeth.
My wife has been binging on game shows lately so I have (sort of) seen more episodes of Family Feud then I ever wanted to. The more recent ones are considerably more risque then the older shows. Yesterday I witnessed this:
Steve Harvey, “So what do you do”?
Middle Aged Lady, “I’m a nurse. And I give the most painless rectal exam you will ever have”.
Steve Harvey (eyes rolling), “There are no painless rectal exams”.
Middle Aged Lady (looking suggestively), “There are when I give them”.
Moving on to her husband after much laughter and open mouthed head shaking -
“Okay Prometheus, you really crossed the line when you gave Man fire. But we’ll give you a choice: and eagle gnawing its way in, or an eel gnawing its way out.”