Has anyone mentioned the court room sketch artist’s take on the scene? If you haven’t seen the renditions, check out the cover of the New Yorker. That is a sketch for the ages.
For one, by filing a civil suit you open yourself up to “discovery”, which is evidence gathering. This includes answering written questions under oath (called interrogatories), having to admit or deny certain facts (called requests for admissions), produce requested documents (requests for production), and sit for depositions.
Sure, he doesn’t necessarily need to answer every question posed - he can take the 5th. But he is subjecting himself to grilling, under oath, by even more attorneys.
I don’t think there’s a jury if the case is immediately dismissed, as I expect this will be.
Also, I wonder if this latest kerfuffle warrants its own thread (though it’s clearly related to this one, since the new lawsuit is a reaction to this case).
Ladies and gentlemen…
Honored guests…
Dear friends…
We are gathered here…to say good-bye to a, uh…
A great man.
Not only was he a model politician, a brilliant businessman
Admired and respected by his fellow lawmakers…
And all those who were fortunate enough…
Enough…
Enough to know him…
He was above all else…a modest man.
His kind will not pass this way again…
And our loss is surely…
Heaven’s gain.
A federal judge on Wednesday denied a request by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office for a temporary restraining order to stop a House Judiciary Committee subpoena of former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz.
-snip-
“There’s politics going on on both sides, let’s be honest about that,” she said.
But the judge, who was appointed to the bench by Trump and confirmed by the Senate in 2019, said she views her task narrowly as determining whether there is valid legislative purpose for the Judiciary Committee’s subpoena of Pomerantz.