The hubble telescope’s picture:
http://evillicus.com/marshubble.jpg
Taken from: New Scientist
My picture:
Not much difference really?
They’re virtually identicle.
And to think, NASA spent billions on the Hubble.
Maybe NASA needs to schedule a shuttle mission to your house to fix your lens! Yeah, that’s it! 
I went out and used my 4" refractor to see Mars last night. Got lucky - it was a really clear night, and I saw more detail in it than ever before.
Could easily make out the polar cap, and much shading from the terrain. Looking at that Hubble photo I could identify what I saw in my scope.
What a great time to have a telescope!
Be honest. Did you switch the pictures?
Yours looks like a picture of the Hubble telescope taking pictures of Mars. It’s only 1 degree of separation so that’s pretty cool.
It’s dust on your lense, isn’t it? Be really honest…
How much did they pay you to switch those pictures?
Dammit NASA, shame on you!
Ah, but you see, through the magic of image enhancement, your picture becomes incredibly sharp and detailed!
It’s the face of Elvis! Or Jesus (I always get those two mixed up). Wonder what he’s doing on Mars? Either way, it explains a lot.
[MiB]
J: You do know Elvis is dead, right?
K: He is not, he just went home.
[/MiB]
I didn’t switch the pictures! I have to admit I put binoculars in front of the camera though. I’m so astronomically savvy.
Wow! To think NASA tried to tell us mars was in fact a sphere when we can clearly see otherwise.
You know, now that I see these two images, i demand to know why my tax dollars have been spent on the former. It’s rather obvious that the two are comperable in quality, so why are billions being spent?
I urge you one and all to write to your congress person and demand that this rubish be put to an end!
Looks more like the penis of Elvis to me…
It’s the same picture isn’t it?
Ha! I see through your cunning plan! Or not…
Where are all those canals? I used to read about them!
Allow me to show you…
Hey, I can see my house!