You kind of forgot about Martin trying to beat someone to death and he was screwing Dede who is 16. Like I said double standard.
Workplace harassment, violent acts against a law enforcement officer, child rape.
Thanks for playing. ![]()
Sorry I meant Evil Economist
Well Witness#9’s name and picture in up on the Internet. I wonder if Zimmerman has a spare bedroom at his safe house?
I suspect the Zimmerman family reunion are going to be worse than my family after cousin Joey shot at my Uncle Joe.
According to Google?age of consent in florida, 17 yr. olds can screw all the 16 yr. olds they want.
If the cousin had an ax to grind, why didn’t she press charges before or after 2005?
Decent guys don’t fuck their female relatives. Period. End of story.
He didn’t have sex with her- please pay attention. He touched her six year old pee-pee maker when he was 7 or 8 years old. Ten years later, she drives over to his house. She lays down on his bed for a massage. He makes a pass at her and she leaves.
It’s just a red herring and prosecutorial psychological intimidation, because the murder case against Zimmerman is a sham. May the prosecutors, at some point, be held accountable for their conduct.
Bullshit. It was ongoing until she was in her teens. He penetrated her with his fingers. That’s fucking. Period.
eta
Really?! Seriously? You’re trying to say he wanted to fuck her but she didn’t give him the chance?!!!
According to her, they only saw each other once a year, and then she stopped going to the yearly family gatherings altogether.
Cause it was probably consensual. There’s no description of forced, violent or aggressive contact or of any threats made of any kind. If these things happened at all, I suspect she went along with it reluctantly or without major objection. She may have felt uncomfortable or uneasy about it- or not. At some point, she may have felt ashamed of what happened and so blamed Zimmerman for “making” her do it- even though she said nothing that indicated that he did. It could be a number of things. Whatever it is, it’s between them to work out.
If there is any truth to her account, then sure. Sexual attraction between family members- particularly cousins- is not particularly rare.
By the way, I think you might be confusing a ‘finger’ with a ‘penis’. They look surprisingly similar so I can understand the confusion.
Was he screwing Dede? Who said that?
And, once again, “trying to beat Zimmerman to death” is YOUR interpretation. Based on what the guy that killed him said. Yep, a really reliable source that.
That’s not possible.
- Honesty
Does anyone know what the statute of limitations is in Florida for these sort of charges? Maybe Zimmerman will evade justice on the murder thing and go to jail on the rape thing.
Of course, his supporters will send him enough money that he’ll get rich off the molestation thing, I’m sure. They should track the donations so we can see what pays better: rape or murder.
Doesn’t seem likely, unless she pulled a Clinton and has an old dress around:
How are the prosecutors to blame here?
This woman sought them out with her tales.
We can all write the headlines if they had turned her away with her reports about GZ racism. She’d be the mystery witness that the conspiracists would’ve latched on to.
So they listened to her tale. But in doing so, everything she said became discoverable.
I don’t think that the state has had a very good record so far in keeping things from the press.
So, the prosecutors didn’t seek her out, couldn’t turn her away, and can’t keep her story a secret.
As near as I can make out, the State doesn’t have a say in this at all. In fact, the State made a (granted, probably perfunctory) effort to oppose the release - see pg 2 of the the statement:
Florida’s sunshine laws mean mean just about everything is made public, and the State shouldn’t be allowed to arbitrary determine what it deems relevant or not; the defense should make that determination.
The State didn’t go out and dig this witness up; she came to them of her own accord.
Yes, the state does. If neither the state or defense ever intended to use her “testimony” in the trial, then it does not have to be included in discovery. Defense specifically said Witness #9 is not relevant to the case. The state insisted that she is.
As it stands, this is a desperation move by the prosecution. They are trying to harass Zimmerman into a plea. I don’t think that will happen - O’Mara is smarter than that.
So in Florida, the state could withhold exculpatory evidence they didn’t intend to use at trial? Man, that state is more fucked up than I ever imagined.