Yes, that’s also a permissible inference, especially because Jeantel, under cross-examination, conceded she wasn’t sure.
But my point is: you can’t say there’s NO evidence.
Amazing how many Team Zimmerman members don’t know what streets are in their neighborhood. Do they all patrol them regularly too? And of course, “he can’t be lying because that would mean he’s lying.” Amazing.
Your post is irrelevant. Of course in grammar school we had a age appropriate assembly on it, when i was in tenth grade we had a more specific or graphic talk by a deputy. you make it sound as if this is something that doesnt apply to teenage kids, you are either ill informed, or trying to downplay or minimize the reality of molestation child abductions that do happen to older kids.
No. And multiple posters here have said that they don’t know all the cross streets in their neighborhood. I myself didn’t know the name of the closest cross-street to my house when challenged IRL by someone to name it. So many people here have given you personal assurances that they also don’t know this kind of fact that I don’t understand why you keep repeating your claim.
I don’t agree at all with your idea that it’s incumbent on the jury to conclude that’s a Zimmerman lie.
(cough, cough, gag)…a LIE ?
What channel was the deputy on? Was it the same one as the other show you watched?
You tell me.
Bricker, your the genius…you tell me
Ok. The deputy was on the same channel as the other guy, and it’s a channel you watch quite frequently when you need facts to buttress your claims here.
Bricker, I dont know how old you are, if you ever went to school , or if it was in the last half a century, but in todays society, there is something called child abductions, the most dangerous situation that kids are warned to avoid or be aware of is when a stranger is following them or approaches them in a car. This is something that can and does happen to kids even high school age kids. When the deputy talked to us at my school it was emphasized to us the reason the car scenario is so dangerous, is because of the obvious potential to be pulled inside and taken to a second location and that is always a situation that ends badly. Your attempt to mock this makes it clear you just really really dont want the whole picture to be considered, because thats not helpful to your cause
Ok, same questions I put to Condescending Robot:
To what end? Are you proposing that Zimmerman was setting up a cover story several minutes before the confrontation and shooting occured?
And undermining the cover story by telling the dispatcher he was following Martin?
So, is it your theory that Zimmerman was setting up a cover story for an event that hadn’t happened yet, or what?
Are you saying that high schools do not have child safety assemblies on the issue of child molestation, abduction? make fun all you want of the fact I simply was honest in saying I couldnt remember the name of a news show I saw in regards to a different event…have at it, make fun of it all you want…apparently you have never forgotten or been able to recall the name of a program you saw, and you compulsively write notes on everything you see, hear. I was honest in the fact i simply couldnt recall the name of the show. This has not a damm thing to do with the reality of child abduction/ molestation.
Your attempt to reinvent reality of this very real issue is just an attempt to sweep away this piece of the puzzle, because it doesnt help your cause
Well yes I agree but I’m just pointing out the nature of evidence. It’s far from conclusive. " I think I sorta heard something" is different testimony than loudly hearing “get off me you crazy ass cracker” (having just called him that earlier which lends more credence that it’s Martin).
So far, the only thing remotely suggesting Zimmerman attacked Martin is that one bit of weak testimony.
I’m not sure where you’re going with this but do these instructions include not calling the police, leaving the safety of your house and attacking the stalker?
You have lived in the same house for twenty hears and you dont know the name of even a couple streets right next to you? ;). That is wow, that is really a bit unusual
And you make fun of ME for not remembering the name of a news show I happened to see?
I just moved out of house where I lived for six years, and I can name one of the streets in the neighborhood: the one where my house was, which was also the one that connected the neighborhood to the street that the neighborhood was bounded by.
I can name three streets of my new neighborhood, out of about eight: the ones I have to take to reach the house.
It’s not as unusual as you might think.
[QUOTE=Bricker]
Yes, that’s also a permissible inference, especially because Jeantel, under cross-examination, conceded she wasn’t sure.
But my point is: you can’t say there’s NO evidence.
[/QUOTE]
Correction accepted - there’s no good evidence in its favor, and some against it.
Regards,
Shodan
.
well, im not sure about normal average people, but at least not for people on team zimmerman…;). must be a phenomenom specific for TEAM ZIMMERMAN
“Go team Zimmerman!”
Treating this as a team sport is childish.
Any interest in explaining why Zimmerman would lie to the dispatcher about knowing the address where he parked?
Because he is a racist. Duh.
Regards,
Shodan