I particulary like the unemployment / jury duty thing. (OK, the lapdances too…) But is there a down side? Would jurys that are unemployed be significntly biased in any direction? For example, in a case of wrongful termination, perhaps it’s not such a good idea to have a jury of laid-off people?
I mean, if you’re swamped at work, you are probably likely to defer your service as long as you can. I would guess that if you were unemployed you’d have less of a need to get out of serving.
Sure, there would be some cases like you mentioned. However, there isn’t necessarily any mention of doing away with calling employed people.
The unemployed could certainly be a primary pool to draw from, but it wouldn’t necessarily have to be exclusively them.
True, but it’s often much less flexible. It’s easier for an employed person (in most cases – there are of course exceptions which might be worth another thread) to take time off than for an unemployed person to tell a recruiter “well, I can’t interview at 2:00 because I’m on jury duty.” If anything, I’d think that being on unemployment might reasonably be among the hardships which allow one to defer jury duty.
I would think that recuiters would have to allow for jury duty and be more flexible with scheduling interviews, if Ms. Carey gets elected and accomplishes this goal.
I’ve been looking for work off and on this year, and although I’ve had few interviews they seemed flexible scheduling them.
Five grand for a date with a porn star and all you can be sure of is a political discussion? Sheeze, inflation these days.
Yes, yes, I’m sure you can find other issues of, uhm… importance to you.
On a serious note, she says it will save money:
Perhaps I’m wrong, but I thought that the pay for jury duty was a flat and extremely nominal rate, or at least it was in my experience though I’m not Californian. I don’t see how it would save the government millions of dollars. Wouldn’t the unemployed be paid the same as everyone else?.
When I read the title of the thread, I had an epiphany: I’ll solve my unemployment problem by becoming a full-time, professional jury member! The only problem is…
I think excluding the employed from jury duty would cause horrible problems for the right to a fair trial and to a representative jury. OTOH, if we need to sacrifice some due process for lap dances…