So, the department chairman was a do-nothing figurehead?
Never among anybody who counted. The “talk” was more talk radio and bar chatter.
The disgusting thing about the NC scandal is that it’s more of an academic scandal than a sports scandal. The athletic department didn’t come to Nyang’oro and say “Hey, what do you say, can you create some easy courses for us?” He himself got the idea because, I guess, he thought black kids couldn’t pass otherwise. The athletic department glommed on and started steering its players to the courses only later.
I think it’s even simpler than that. He was heading a department that consisted only of himself, and his duties as department head kept him so busy he couldn’t even teach his own class. I think he was just doing the same thing his “students” were: Taking advantage of the college to get credit for classes that didn’t actually exist.
Is this the case? I don’t recall reading that anywhere; do you have a cite?
“Fabled deserving white kids who got bumped”?
I don’t want to turn this thread into a debate on afirmative action, but seriously? Do you think that affirmative action has no negative consequeces for the people who happen to be on the other end of that affirmative action decision? Those white kids aren’t fabled. They exist. And the consequences of choosing someone for any finite, limited opportunity based on anything other than that person’s qualifications are real and lasting. And wrong. Not just for the people affected, but for the capability and quality of our society overall.
When MLK Jr. asked to not be judged on the color of his skin but the content of his character, that meant just that. Affirmative action does exactly what King didn’t want… and to make a decision based on race (or religion or sex or any other irrelevant critieia) is wrong no matter who does it or what their motives are.
There are so many troublesome threads to this scandal. What people discover when they start pulling on those threads will be interesting.
One of the funniest things you wrote was that this scandal will hurt “the minority students who got pushed out the door with (now worthless) degrees”. I hate to tell you, but any kid who took those AfAm studies classes knew they were a joke. Those degrees were worthless BEFORE the scandal. THAT is what should bother you… Not the fact that the scandal has been exposed.
I think there is a lot of blame to go around, and I want to see accountability. But that should also include those students who took those classes and said nothing. I am not talking about an athlete who had no interest in going to college but had to for any chance to further their athletic career. I am talking about the other “students”… the non-athlete who took those joke classes and earned that joke degree without asking the question “how this could possibly be legit?”
I believe you but I think more credence was given to the notion because back then the Big 10 really was only ten teams. They wanted to add other teams who were a better attraction (read generated more money) than little, crappy Northwestern. For a bit they figured the Big 10 could only have ten teams in it so someone had to go and Northwestern was at the top of the list.
Then they figured screw logic and the Big 10 got more teams while remaining the “Big 10”.
The Wainstein Report describes Nyang’oro as independently wanting to “help” struggling students and “student-athletes”:
However I was relying on a second-hand report which may have overstated the idea that Crowder and Nyang’oro developed the courses independently. Per the Report,
So it sounds as if the athletic department was involved in creation of the courses earlier on than I had believed.
Awesome cites, Freddy; thanks so much for bringing them to the discussion.
I didn’t know any of the background of the department so that was some good info.
ETA: I just found a fairly good article on Forbes by a guy named James Marshall Crotty that has links to the Wainstein Report and to other data points.
[QUOTE=t-bonham@scc.net]
I pretty much assume that in general any college athlete degree is one in name only; that they took classes requiring minimal work or in regular classes they didn’t do the work themselves.
Haven’t yet seen any significant evidence to disprove this.
[/QUOTE]
Anecdotally, there is Joe Thomas, who was on the honor roll four years running and an Academic All-American. He received the Outland Trophy and was drafted in the first round (third overall) and is currently a starting offensive tackle in the NFL. He took regular classes and he certainly did the work.
So there’s that.
Of course, he went to my alma mater, not UNC, but FWIW.
Regards,
Shodan
Steve Young’s law degree and John Frank’s medical degree (both multiple Super Bowl winning players for the 49ers) would disagree with the premise of the “enough to stay on the team” college efforts for student atheltes.
Former Tennessee Titan, Myron Rolle, and NBA Hall of Famer, Bill Bradley, would, also, like to throw their Rhodes Scholarships on the table, as well, to show just enough to win.
UNC, however, meh, it’s not like it’s Duke.
There’s also Alan Page, who was one of the feared ‘Purple People Eaters’ on the Minnesota Vikings years ago, and is now one of the most respected members of the Minnesota Supreme Court. But he did once mention at an event that the coaches always had to do diagrams on the board for new plays, because several of the players were functionally illiterate and couldn’t read the playbook descriptions.
But all these descriptions of some athletes who were also good students is missing the point – of course there are always a few exceptional people. What are the statistics for student-athletes as a whole? How many of them actually graduate with a degree at the end of 4 years?
As I recall from my days at the University of Minnesota, for athletes it was quite a bit worse than for students as a whole. And even that was achieved only by lumping in all the athletes from minor sports – for the football team, I think only about a third actually graduated.
There’s also Alan Page, who was one of the feared ‘Purple People Eaters’ on the Minnesota Vikings years ago, and is now one of the most respected members of the Minnesota Supreme Court. But he did once mention at an event that the coaches always had to do diagrams on the board for new plays, because several of the players were functionally illiterate and couldn’t read the playbook descriptions.
But all these descriptions of some athletes who were also good students is missing the point – of course there are always a few exceptional people. What are the statistics for student-athletes as a whole? How many of them actually graduate with a degree at the end of 4 years?
As I recall from my days at the University of Minnesota, for athletes it was quite a bit worse than for students as a whole. And even that was achieved only by lumping in all the athletes from minor sports – for the football team, I think only about a third actually graduated.
Idk when you went to school but first cite I dug up from 2012 was 83 percent for Gophers football. http://www.gophersports.com/genrel/102512aaa.html
This is the piece, I guess. The NCAA has started penalizing athletic departments for poor academic performance with player suspensions, scholarship reductions, and team banishments from postseason. Student athletes have to be much more student than ever.
Too late to add to last post but the football rate was 69 percent. Overall athletics was 83.
Also in 2010, overall graduation rates at U of Minnesota was 66 percent. Graduation rates on the rise at U – The Minnesota Daily. The football team best that and even the basketball team dragging things down at 54 percent was at least relatively competitive with that rate.
Updating this thread:
So, the NCAA found that a huge revenue generating school ‘did nothing wrong’? Why am I not surprised.