You have to buy me dinner first.
Baskin Robbins!? Jeez, that’s just sick. But Dunkin’ Donuts – now, that’s a challenge.
“Hmm, nice glaze on the bear claws this morning, officer.”
Slut! I’m strictly a “dinner and a show” guy! OK, a burger and a TV movie qualify, but it has to be cable!
" You mean this isn’t rum raisin?? Aiiiieeeeeee ! ! ! ! ! "
:eek:
This pisses me off to no end (which is kind of sad, actually; you’d think I’d have better things to get worked up about). The sin of Onan was not pulling out, or masturbating, or anything like that. He was punished for pulling out; not for the act itself, but for its consequences. Jewish males had an obligation to impregnate their brother(s)’* wives, if the brother died without progeny. Onan’s brother died, and he pulled out of the widow, refusing to impregnate her. That was the problem, not the concept of pulling out. Scholars may correct me, but that’s the impression that I got.
*-Ok, there is no graceful way to write that.
Captain Carrot You’re correct. By pulling out, Onan defied a direct command from G-d, derived his sister in law of children, got himself a much bigger share of his brother’s estate, and all that after satisfying his sexual desires rather than just saying no to start with. To Jews, Onan’s sin was not the spilling of seed but disobeying G-d and for selfish reasons.
That being said, I just wanted to use a word other than masturbators. Even if the term Onanist is based on a misreading of the story, the meaning of the term is generally understood. In retrospect, I should have gone with “kitten killers”.
…and imagine the blisters…on both hands