Did I say that, fucknuts?
The idiot said because he couldn’t see a single drop of blood, that meant the guy was innocent. Others pointed out to him that the vehicle would obviously be searched and fibers and such TESTED IN A LAB.
Nor should the cops have let him near a crime scene. Jesus, you’re a fucking moron.
I don’t see why they shouldn’t have let him identify the body, poppet.
I’m pretty sure they didn’t let him near the car. He probably shouted obcenities at the forensics guys while he was forcibly removed from the area, and then rewrote that in his mind to equal him walzing up to the car, ripping off his sunglasses dramatically, and proclaiming his judgement.
Guys like this always add fantastic details to their stories in order to bolster their poor self-esteem. The problem is that he probably does this so much that he has convinced himself that his version is true. The human brain is a strange beast.
I’m no forensic scientist, but isn’t identification usually done in the morgue? In any case, I can’t imagine the cops letting him in to ID the body while it was still an active crime scene.
I’ve never identified a body at a crime scene and I’ve never identified a body full stop in America… point being I’m quite happy to admit being ignorant, I’m not going to proclaim myself chief judge of plausible police procedure ™ particularly with what according to OP’s account is a force that doesn’t really stick to those procedures in the first place.
edit: It occurs to me though that I have strolled around road traffic accident scenes in the UK before, and they are treated as potential crime scenes when there’s a possibility of a death.
Okay, I’ve examined all the new evidence and it proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that
you’re a stupid bastard
Geez, Guin…it takes our buddy Stan long enough to return to threads as it is. Did you have to give him a link that he’s just going to wind up fapping over for a couple of hours?
Not a lot of friends with those benefits, though.
It’s quite amusing here. I suspect at least half of those piling on were bullied at school, but instead of learning from it they’re trying to reverse the roles now.
Even more amusingly, it blatantly isn’t going to annoy Stan one bit. So you even fail at bullying, and you outnumber him ten to one!
Pathetic 
These articles also seem to have nothing to do with the original thread. They all seem to be about allegations of a racist cop.
you’re cool
I’ve never identified a body either, but common sense tells me that his version of what happened is most likely bullshit. He said:
Here’s the problems I see with this:
generally cops won’t tell you what happened at a crime scene just because you wander up and ask.
generally cops won’t let you ‘insist’ on doing anything. I find it unlikely that he could have talked his way into seeing the body, and also into not going with the police when they told him to.
if there were paramedics there still working on her I find it hard to believe you could even get close enough to the body to ID it.
he says that there were multiple cops and ambulances there. I’m willing to believe that one or two cops might be corrupt and break procedure, but this requires us to believe that every single one of those cops were willing to turn a blind eye to some mope coming up and having his way with a crime scene.
Stan says that not only did he walk up and see the body, but that he also managed to walk right up to a car that was being inspected by the police. How likely is it that he did this twice?
Now, I know that none of the above are absolutes, and I’m not an expert in crime scene analysis. But I find it unlikely in the extreme that this went down the way he describes. Particularly since Stan has shown himself to be prone to…let’s say, ‘flights of fancy’.
They didn’t.
Stan the Man claims he swaggered into a crime scene containing a dead body late at night and proceeded to start ordering the cops around, “insisting” on this and that. Yeaaaariight. :rolleyes:
Excuse me, but do you think you could keep your pesky facts out of Stan’s Thread of Glory and Redemption™?
Thanks!
knobcheese
Yep. If they had let him do it at the scene of the accident/crime he could have contaminated evidence.
Christ, doesn’t ANYONE watch Law & Order?! 
Seriously though, I’ve seen enough documentaries on A&E, The History Channel, and read enough to know that there’s no way he’d have been allowed to do what he claims. Dude’s full of shit.
Oh, and so are you, Happy Poster/Angry Lurker.
I’ll park the facts out in the corridor. On with the show!
So Happy Poster is Angry Lurker? Except now with more misogyny it seems.
You’re a psychologist now are you?
Do you even know what misogyny is?
Evil twin, hence the “opposite” name.