I never said she deserved to get punched in the face, gravy-chugger. You are the one and only who decide my failed relationship was all my fault but Oksana is a victim of circumstance, You also wanted to get all up in my grill about my choice of insult words. Still waiting on your history of railing against that on an equal opportunity basis.
You sexy beast. I’m so sad you didn’t post your picture so I can know what kind of sweet ass I’m missing out on. Damn. I better get to the gym so I can get a winner like you to impregnate me, then I can leave you for someone who isn’t psychotic, and live off of your money like queen I am. Shit, sorry, I don’t have time to do your research for you, handsome! I’ve got to go improve myself!
But really, why does it bother you so much if Mel Gibson has to pay child support? Is it because he clearly wanted a blow job, so this nasty cunt must have tricked him into banging her?
Is it possible Mel’s a first-class despicable asshole, AND Oksana is a gold digging, soul sucking bitch? I don’t have access to the tapes proving the latter, though. 
Something tells me that Mel would love to have a tape of him sucking his soul (before the jacuzzi, of course).
All of this is so fucking stupid. But I did just want to say that you really find out things about the people on this board through threads like this. And really, scumbag, if you have seen Diosa’s picture, you would know that she is, in reality, a beautiful girl. Where’s your photo, since you want to drag looks into it?
Are you suuuuuuuuure about that? Absolutely, positively sure about that?
He told his wife. I would call that “going around telling people.” maybe she shouldn’t have repeated it her, but we don’t know that he told anyone but his wife. Pretty much anyone would tell their spouse if they saw a major celebrity at a 12 step meeting. That’s one of the best things about having a spouse. They’re the person you can tell stuff that you’re not supposed to tell anybody about.
To anything at all about the abuse, or really anything at all that’s any of our business. Speculating about her character is pure, misogynist, bullshit victim blaming, vicious, sexist hate speech.
I still don’t really know what “gold digger” means, but if it means fucking somebody for money, there’s nothing wrong, dishonest or immoral about it. It’s also still possible that she actually was in love with him, isn’t it?
Likewise, still waiting on that photo, you studmuffin, you!
Dio, a golddigger means someone BEING dishonest about fucking for money. They pretend they’re NOT doing so.
Come on mate, it’s celebrity gossip, who else but the gutter press would be having at it? Oh alright then:
"Gibson’s representative Alan Nierob would not confirm the actor’s plans to move back to Australia. Nierob said the Oscar winner was planning on staying put in the US. He told NBC: “There’s no truth to the Mail story.”
and
“Report: Mel Gibson Planning Move to Australia With Ex-Wife”
Brilliantly fox news links to the contradicting Telegraph story. 
Do we have some evidence that she was either fucking him for money, or being dishonest about?
Most of the web dictionary definitions of gold don’t use deceiptfulness but are variants of this one:
Agreed- was in fact the first to say- I see no ethical problem with being a gold digger so long as there’s not a false pretense of love, and that’s why I don’t understand the equation that to say she’s a gold digger is to say she deserves abuse.
Dio, there’s not that much evidence of anything here and that hasn’t stopped this swelling to ten pages of bickering.
Of course the evidence we have points to Mel being and abusive douchbag and Oksana being a clear victim.
However, I wonder Dio, if you would change your position or retract any of your statements if further evidence did come to light? What if the physical abuse was called into question? The legitimacy of the tapes? Hard evidence that Oksana had been blackmailing Mel for the last few months? Would you dismiss any new evidence contrary to the position you’ve clung to as ‘irrelevant’ or ‘flawed’, or could you state here and now what evidence might make you reconsider?
Again, I don’t expect such evidence and I have no love for Mel Gibson, but generally I’m willing to wait until his side at least respond before I start frothing at the mouth and rounding up the mob.
SD
YOU don’t think golddigger=justifies abuse, but almost everyone, from what I can tell, disagrees with you. I’m seeing comments everywhere, “Oh, golddigging whore got what she deserved.” and variations on that general theme.
Missed the edit window.
From the comments in this article.
Again, I don’t care if she’s a saint or a gold-digger. I think we owe it to abused women to provide SUPPORT while she’s leaving her abuser. It’s the most vulnerable time. If you want women to leave, then provide support to victims. Don’t blame, recriminate and deny and then call women idiots when they stay.
I don’t se any evidence that Oksana is a gold-digger. She does seem to have an attaction to wealthy, famous men, but I don’t think that’s the same thing as being a gold-digger, really.
She is, clearly, a home-wrecker, given that she pursued a relationship with a man who was known to be married. Of course, Mel was more culpable in this than she was, given that the home they wrecked was his home.
Furthermore, I’d give her a pass on the home-wrecking anyway, since it appears she was actually doing a favor to the woman whose home she helped wreck. Clearly, Robyn is a good deal better off without that crazy fucker.
There’s nothing very abstract about it. If you heard a story about a particular store being robbed at gunpoint, and then heard a bunch of other people complaining forcefully and angrily about how obvious it was that that store had been cheating its customers, you’d think that was connected to the fact that the store was robbed. If one of them then said “I don’t think there’s anything ethically wrong with overpricing merchandise, mind,” you’d just be confused. Why did they bring it up, then? Especially if they’d never heard of the store before it got robbed?
In theory, it’s possible that these are two completely unrelated phenomena in those people’s minds, and that it just so happens that the story about the violence inspired little zephyrs of thought that led to a stimulating intellectual conversation about the victim’s moral character that just so happens to exactly parallel your typical victim-blaming approach that just so happens to always accompany stories of domestic abuse, but if you aren’t a stupid person that isn’t what you’ll bet your lunch money on.
If the gold-digging is really completely unrelated to the abuse, why are so many people talking about it when the only actual news is about the abuse? How did that happen? Isn’t there anything else about this woman worth speculating about for no reason at all that has anything to do with the fact that there’s a tape of her being abused? Again, sure, it’s possible that a person who wants to focus on her motivations in the relationship has no desire to mitigate the extent of the wrong done to her, but it sure doesn’t seem likely.
I only listened to one of the tapes, does Gibson himself accuse her of being a gold digger?
Also, if it wasn’t for that darned jacuzzi …
If the Queen had a dick she’d be the King. None of that stuff is in question. There is nothing else to learn. He admits the abuse and makes death threats on tape. Game over.