oh you know, those veneer wearing WHORES! Nobody has veneers for good intent, be sure of that
So is that why Mel is seeking custody?
No, he’s doing that to try to hurt the kid’s mother. He won’t succeed, though.
I agree with that- sort of like alimony would be for a spouse- it’s a way for the kid to maintain the lifestyle it is accustomed to. But I think more than that, it’s important to remember that celebrity kids have challenges that “regular” kids don’t- people try to kidnap them, people sneaking photos of them in school to sell, etc. I look at Michael Jackson’s kids (who a photo of is probably worth more than Mel’s kids, but still)-- they have to have a full time security team (and have their whole lives, because they’ve received constant threats since birth), they are going to be going to private school soon because public schools- quite reasonably- aren’t too fond of the attention the kids would bring on their campuses, etc. Shit happens. And does anybody honestly believe Oksana hasn’t received death threats (other than from Mel, I mean)? Or kidnapping threats? C’mon. People are scummy. And all of that extra care? It costs money. Mel knows because he probably pays that shit out now.
The better to suck dick before the jacuzzi for. . . .
This is a whoosh, right? Otherwise this is incredibly brainless, even for you. :rolleyes:
Gibson is a total bunny-boiler.
Dutchman, could you summarize roughly what your position is here? Could you characterize the situation as you understand it - what happened, what didn’t happen, why it happened, etc. ? I’m not trying to play rhetorical games or anything. I would like to hear what you’re ultimately trying to establish.
Did the woman do something wrong? If so, what?
What should happen to the kid? What should happen to Mel Gibson? What should happen to the woman?
Absolutely true. And you know what, I used to think Michael was NUTS for having those kids in masks and stuff until one of the friends of the family said that when they were with him then the press would know they were his. If they went out with someone else without the masks, nobody would know who they were so they could go to movies and stuff like other kids. Not a bad idea.
Also, in the book The Gift of Fear the author says that celebrities have stalkers and death threats in numbers that would blow your mind. He goes into the sheer number of them and it’s unreal. For every one you read about he says there are hundreds you don’t.
A friend of mine has gotten to know (through work) a very famous couple with children. He said their lives are unreal when it comes to paparazzi and fans and what they’re willing to do. It doesn’t matter if they’re holding their kids or not. People are nuts
Because that tooth was chipped before.
Wait, you do realize that veneers aren’t just used for chipped teeth, right? You get that thousands of people get them every year as a cosmetic answer to discolored teeth, right?
Except her dentist has publicly given a statement that it wasn’t. Did you see her teeth before and know something he does not?
[QUOTE=DiosaBellissima]
I agree with that- sort of like alimony would be for a spouse- it’s a way for the kid to maintain the lifestyle it is accustomed to. But I think more than that, it’s important to remember that celebrity kids have challenges that “regular” kids don’t- people try to kidnap them, people sneaking photos of them in school to sell, etc.
[/QUOTE]
But you know, even more fundamentally than that, it’s Mel Gibson’s child. He voluntarily begat of this woman, and now there is a human child in the world. What other standard could we ever use to determine what kind of lifestyle the kid ought to have than the one he was born into? Gibson made a choice and brought the kid into the world of having things; why should the kid be held to a different standard just because Gibson’s a screwup? It’s kind of a bullshit tactic to begin with to suggest that Gibson is being asked to finance “somebody else’s lifestyle;” it’s his fucking lifestyle. Even if it isn’t only the strict necessities that are being paid for - and of course it isn’t - ultimately, whose decision was that? Why even bother figuring out what somebody else’s kid’s life would be like? It ain’t somebody else’s kid.
Cite?
Not that it matters whetre he broke a veneer or broke a tooth. He still punched her in the face either way, and admitted it on tape.
That’s not smiling, that’s how you grimace to show your teeth in a dental office in order to photograph them. Try it. We’ve got many sets of those from the dentist and orthodontist. That’s probably about as far as she was able to open her mouth at that point, judging by how swollen her mouth is (beyond the cosmetic inflation). She has one veneer knocked off, and you have no way of knowing if the chip out of the other tooth was there before, or if he knocked it off. Not that any of this makes a bit of difference.
Is there a link to this photo?
Here. Can’t you see how jovial and full of glee she is in that picture?
I’m only here to present some ballance to all the moral outrage against Mel. Listening to Oxana’s calm responses following Mel’s tantrums on the tapes leads me to suspect a set up. That leads me to suspect she’s simply a coniving woman.The so called admission on Mel’s part where he said she deserved it may simply have been " if you want to believe I hit you then you may as well believe you deserved it". Not unusual for me to respond that way when the “admission” is expected to be totally useless to anyone else.
As far as the blow job is concerned, and I haven’t heard the tape, I can understand that when a man gets enthusiastic blow jobs from the woman he loves and then it becomes a chore or no longer, you gotta wonder why she doesn’t love you anymore and the possibility you were set up, particularly for a rich man becomes very real. At that point you might as well demand it rather than beg. After all, he paid for this whore.
Mel has a record for being a stable upright husband and father for 26 years. Oxana has gone through several husbands and no previous kids.
I need not present the other side because it is well represented here. The big issue is still did he hit her or didn’t he. Apparently Mel denies it .
Lets wait till the justice system decides.
Except that’s not what he said. He said, “You fucking deserved it.”
Now, if it was what you say, he would have said it that way. Or he would say, “You would have deserved it.”
“You fucking deserved it” is quite the declarative and clear statement. It’s surprising to me that folks are hearing that as anything but what it is.
Several husbands? She was married once, I believe. You honestly believe Mel is a heart-broken victim, when he threatens to murder the woman and tell her he hopes she’s raped by a pack of of insert-racial-slur-of-his-choice-here?
If someone talks to someone like that, it’s abuse – it doesn’t have to be physical, fuckstick. It’s called emotional abuse. And like I’m REALLY going to want to give oral sex to someone who treats me like THAT.
Good god, you are fucking stupid.
Non-indicator. If she’d shown any emotion, people would be saying she was trying to provoke him. Or that she was a hysterical bitch.
Diosa: Yeah, that’s not a smile.
I’ve been trying to stay out of this thread, but I wanted to address this.
At what percentage do we say a tooth is knocked out? The whole thing? Half? 1/4?
If there is damage the entire tooth is not intact, to me it’s “knocked out” and the various degrees of it can be sorted out by lawyers, cops, and dentists. I don’t need technical terms: if even part of it is gone, it’s gone.
I speak from personal experience. My ex punched me in the face and knocked out my tooth. (I guess for the pedantic around here, it was only half my tooth, but it wasn’t exactly a fully functional tooth).
I had no facial swelling. I had no bruises. I had no cuts. Literally the only physical damage I sustained at that time was my tooth being knocked out.
Oh, this was done to me because he was screaming at me and I got scared and I ran for the door. He stood on the stairs, called me a cunt, and punched me.
So that’s what happens when you try to leave. That’s why we stay.