Well, Willie Brown, the mayor of San Francisco, who loves to overdress, usually wears a fedora. However, now that he’s trying for another term, it’s clear people are pretty sick of him (for many other reasons), so maybe that will help do in the fedora. When you listen to him and his only two significant contesters for the job, and take a poll in The City, you conclude the people on that side of the Bay would sure like to have a none-of-the-above slot on their ballots. Brown is pretty much all talk; Reilly is also, and has a record of having beat up a girlfriend; and Jordan is a right-winger who’s been there and been dumped once already.
I guess I sort of rode in on the early edge of the no-hat tide. . .and I hope it stays that way, certainly in severely moderate climates, such as Berkeley’s, particularly for those with severely all-weather skin. I don’t wear a hat when I go hiking even.
Since it appears that both men and women quit wearing hats over a period of about the same time, how can one blame the military for causing hatlessness?
A pox on those who would bring hats back. The idea of mens hats should always be associated with those of zuit-suiters or those of Cholo / NY Puerto Rican reversed baseball caps. . .and kept only in museums. And the idea of women’s hats should be associated with those superwide-brimmed feathery concoctions and the pile-of-fruit type. . .and kept in museums also. If living in Antarctica, either sex should be allowed to wear a simple tight ear-covering cap or parka; or if you’re very light-complexioned, you may wear a wide-brimmed straw hat in bright sunlight. Anything else should be at a penalty of a huge hat tax imposed to support my Society of Bareheaders (SOBs).
Also, if anyone wants to join me, we can wear ties that drop from the nape of the neck, in hopes that that will help rid the world of the notion of ties, in a manner similar to the effect backwards baseball caps had on hats. I also think pigtails (which could be pulled) helped rid us of beards, at one time, also. Of course, Berkeley reminds one of a barnyard. . .with all its inhabitants sporting rings in every appendage imaginable (and often exposed). Of course, everyone should have tattoos, because they don’t get in the way of anything. In fact, we could probably do away with clothes as decorations, in favor of tatoos – digital (1-0, not finger-toe) ones, of course, that could be run as animated gifs or Java or suh’m. That would serve the fashion industry right. All you’d have to do would be to download illegal MP3-coded files that would run your body’s multimedia integral garments.
Ray (If evolution had wanted you to have all those accessories, it’d’ve programmed them into your DNA.)