For those unfamiliar with these sites, Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes are review sites. But instead of reviewing (movies, games, TV, etc.) they aggregate reviews, creating a “score” for a film and linking to the individual reviews.
I’ve always used both sites to assess the movies playing in town. Not the big releases. I usually know whether or not I’m going to see the latest blockbuster well before it shows up on the local theater schedules. But for the indies and foreign releases, these sites are very useful. If I had not used these sites the week films like Mogul Mowgli, Settlers, or Coda hit the screens, they would have slipped right by me.
I always thought of Metacritic as the site with higher, stricter standards, with a wider range of films on its list, while Rotten Tomatoes was more the “people’s choice” site and seemed not to list as many obscure films as Metacritic. But lately, it seems like Metacritic has cut way back on the films it lists, and if it lists an obscure film, it is likely to have no score, even if Rotten Tomatoes has a bunch of reviews listed. As an example, try finding the newly released (in America) Only The Animals on both sites. 97% on Rotten Tomatoes with 32 reviews listed. Nonexistent on Metacritic.
So, is Metacritic slipping? Do use either of these sites? Is there a better way to sort out the gems in independent and foreign films?