Remember Conservapedia? Now there’s a version for WNs: Metapedia:
http :// en .metapedia. org/wiki/ Main_Page
(Link broken in deference to Board rules against linking to “hate sites.”) At present, there is actually very little content on it, and what there is is vague, poorly documented assertions. Not worth Pitting, really, except on general principles. The article on Hitler is a laugh and a half.
By some oversight the article on Hitler makes no mention of the Holocaust or concentration camps. I’m sure they’ll correct that soon. 
[QUOTE=aldiboronti]
By some oversight the article on Hitler makes no mention of the Holocaust or concentration camps. I’m sure they’ll correct that soon. 
[/QUOTE]
Oh, there’s a separate page on the Holocaust. (You can guess the slant.)
[QUOTE=aldiboronti]
By some oversight the article on Hitler makes no mention of the Holocaust or concentration camps. I’m sure they’ll correct that soon.
[/QUOTE]
If somebody started an entry on Golda Meir or Dr. Ruth or Anne Frank, it’d make my day.
Dr. Ruth was a terrorist, a sniper for the Irgun (the more radical and militant of the Zionist groups.)
Cue Aerosmith: Granny’s got a gun, chicka-wang wang…
The article on URL=http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Josef_Mengele Mengele is great.
“He was in the German Army for a time, won a few medals, OHWAITSKIPABITOFENTIRELYUNIMPORTANTTIME for some reason he found himself in South America.”
I’d note that the first part, which does mention the whole experimentation and killing business, is entirely copied from Wikipedia.
Please do not link directly to this site.
Is it open for editing, or have they locked it down to members only yet?
I say ‘yet’, because that’s exactly what will happen. These folks are really just mistaken in thinking a wiki was suitable for their needs.
[QUOTE=aldiboronti]
By some oversight the article on Hitler makes no mention of the Holocaust or concentration camps. I’m sure they’ll correct that soon.
[/QUOTE]
I’m surprised how negative they are about his painting.
[QUOTE=elucidator]
Dr. Ruth was a terrorist, a sniper for the Irgun (the more radical and militant of the Zionist groups.)
Cue Aerosmith: Granny’s got a gun, chicka-wang wang…
[/QUOTE]
Actually, she fought in the (mainstream, left-wing) Haganah.
At least she wasn’t in the totally radical Hadassah…
She also lost her virginity in a kibbutz hayloft.
We Israelis see that as a point of national pride.
It’s blocked at work. Obviously the huge multi-national oil corporation that I work for is a secret Trotskyist cabal :smack:
[QUOTE=fluiddruid]
Please do not link directly to this site.
[/QUOTE]
Whoops, sorry.
[QUOTE=Mangetout]
I’m surprised how negative they are about his painting.
[/QUOTE]
Fair judgment. Hitler’s real talent was in performance art.
[QUOTE=Mangetout]
I’m surprised how negative they are about his painting.
[/QUOTE]
Hitler… there was a painter! He could paint an entire apartment in ONE afternoon! TWO COATS!
Wow. It presents the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as genuine.
[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
Fair judgment. Hitler’s real talent was in performance art.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, and that’s not even a joke. His real talent really was performance art, see “Triumph of the Will”.
[QUOTE=Lemur866]
Yeah, and that’s not even a joke. His real talent really was performance art, see “Triumph of the Will”.
[/QUOTE]
No, really. From The City in Mind: Notes on the Urban Condition, by James Howard Kunstler, chapter on Berlin:
[QUOTE=Alessan]
She also lost her virginity in a kibbutz hayloft.
We Israelis see that as a point of national pride.
[/QUOTE]
I saw her picture as a Milwaukee schoolteacher. We remember her as an elderly nana, but back in the day I’d hit it, hayloft or no.
Yes, this goy always had a thing for hot Jewish chicks. Even before we were that serious with each other my wife, who knew some of the HJCs, noted they probably didn’t reciprocate. 
Bitch probably didn’t want to share me.