Metric vs ________ ?

You can scratch these two off the list, if you’d like. Moles aren’t really a unit of anything; you can eliminate them entirely if you’re not afraid of scientific notation. Don’t say that you have 3.2 moles of hydrogen molecules; say instead that you have 1.972*10[sup]24[/sup] hydrogen molecules. For intensity of light, watts (defined in terms of meters, kilograms, and seconds) work just fine. Of course, real physicists don’t bother with any units at all, and measure everything in Plancks.

CGS and MKS (SI) are both metric systems, but there’s still other metric units which don’t belong to either system. The parsec and the calorie, for instance, are both commonly used with the metric prefixes, and the calorie is based (originally) on metric units, albeit in a different manner than the Joule.

I work in the natural gas industry and here in the UK the standard measure of pressure is the BAR ( 1 BAR= 1 Atmosphere = approx 15psi . Another pressure unit in use in Europe is the Pascal . So even here there are two rival metric pressure unit in use.

Of course I would be remiss not to link to http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/index.html. It demonstrates the mind boggling number of units available.

Any thing that has references like the following can’t be all bad.

or how about

or even the

When it comes to pressure, while the scientific community uses “correct” units, engineers and plnbers tend to use practical units like Kg/cm2 and meters of water column.

A bar and an atmosphere are not equivalent

China has retained the old names for the new metric units. They had a unit of weight which was about a pound so they made it 1/2 kilo. It is a bit strange to go about China and buy stuff by the half kilo. (of course, just when I need it the name escapes me… I was not even 20 when my girlfriend told me I was a forgetful dirty old man… and since then I’ve gotten worse on both counts)