Hi.
I’ve tried to google this, but the following scenarios are all that I’m presented with…
[ul]
[li]Someone asks the quesiton on a forum, someone else says “I found this link incredibly useful”, and the link goes to a dead page (article not found)[/li]
[li]Someone asks the question on a stack exchange site and gets his head bitten off (lately those sites are full of eliteist assholes) for not checking the existing question page all about licencing (which doesn’t actually answer the specific question)[/li]
[li]You google it, and end up on a microsoft site, which gives you a hundred million lines of obscure waffle and a crowded tree-structure of branch links that will actually melt your brain before you get to the one sentence that answers your question.[/li]
[/ul]
So… I thought of the dope where, as I remember it, there are experts in almost everything.
We are basically undergoing a process of transfering a physical server infrastructure into a virtual environment. Most of the servers have volume licences of Microsoft Windows 2008 R2 (and some 2003)
We want to be able to ‘build’ the virtual environment before we decomission the physical (to avoid downtime)
I know that data center licences are ridonculously expensive and it would be wasteful to not use the individual volume licences we own.
So, quesiton 1. Can we activate virtual servers using our volume licences before we uninstall the physical equivalents for some kind of grace period?
Question 2 - If we do purchase data center licences, one per physical server, are virtual machines then tied to the server they were created on? In other words, we have a virtual machine (located on a SAN) running on one physical server 1. Physical server 1 explodes. We migrate the vm to physical server 2 (note, it hasn’t moved to another file system, it’s on a SAN) does the original licence applied to the OS on that VM still apply?