Finally, someone with a Ph.D. weighs in!
Okay, just to be clear here, my Doper name is from an old TV character on the Adventures of Superman. I myself don’t pretend to have more than an intelligent layman’s background in science. And the OP isn’t really Lucky’s speech from Godot, but it certainly has that tone.
No, I’m with you, professor. I Googled your user name and laughed at the first image that popped up.
Reading about Lucky’s speech was interesting.
Asked and answered
Humans are unable to perceive (without aid of equipment) much of the light and sound spectrum. So the average human is not burdened with ‘full physical understanding’ of even this (local) earth environment. I can also attest to the fact that some humans are oblivious to certain ranges of smells, especially after they’ve been working outside on a hot day. So, many humans aren’t even burdened with ‘full physical understanding’ of their own bodies.
And this is why we have the phrase “blissfully ignorant.” That way, many humans avoid the angst that you appear to be drawn by.
It’s apparent that either my title name choice or the subject that I chose is furthering the same sort of mass criticism.
I am not saying these things out of pure belief or lack of knowledge in other disciplines of thought. I am merely stating how simple life would be if we were to drop the current memes that are pulling our culture down.
Most often i notice that if the mold doesn’t fit the cake it probably didn’t come from that mold. I find it rather awe inspiring the amount of variants in our universe, the sheer mass of probability.
I know i tend to get off onto different subjects, but to me its all different kinds of batter in the same cake. Do you realize that if there is more than we know, a binary result occurs, there either is or isn’t more than we know. Assuming there are infinite possibilities in the universe, and we’ve added millions of “fictional” realities to an already infinite universe, does that mean we truly have the ability to create anything we imagine. Through TV, novels, plays we are creating possible realities that could and do exist, image what the E.T.'s are watching, i hope they think jersey shore is as mind numbing as i do.
After all most of everything we’ve imagined so far has come to fruition one way or another, or is in the process of becoming a reality. Light speed travel for instance, up until about a year ago we weren’t sure about the Higgs Boson, or neutrino’s that actually travel faster than light slightly out of phase with our space/time. With that knowledge and dimensional theory, we know now that all we have to do is project a field of these rare particles around a from of transportation. If that vessel then is bathed in a frequency that bends the Boson’s into an inverted state the vessel would stay together at faster than light speed.
The tricky part relating to faster than light travel is the time variable. Without some sort of insulation to time any living creature would die within minutes of attaining this rate of speed. The tissues would age dramatically faster, within seconds the mind of a living creature would succumb to spatial phase sickness. Kind of like sea sickness but your body and it’s functions would technically be much further apart from the brain in theory, causing some sort of nervous system shock.
That is where the dimensional shift must occur, the “pilot” would have to bend a 5th dimensional fold around the vessel into a parallel/alternate universe where either the big bang never occurred (best scenario) or one where light travels slower than our universe. If the fundamental laws relating to light/time/energy/mass do not apply then the negative affects surmised in the previous bit may not necessarily occur.
May I mambo dogface to the banana patch?
Amazingly accurate and descriptive thread title, at least!
Yeah, that’s it. It’s your name, or the title, not the rambling and nonsense.
Yeah.
Yes, you are.
And those memes… are?
No.
No, we aren’t, no many of them couldn’t, no they do not.
No it hasn’t, no it isn’t.
Your ignorance is showing, again. The Standard Model predicted the Higgs which is why we were looking for it. Either everything we knew about particle Physics was wrong, or there was the Higgs somewhere. And everything we knew wasn’t wrong. Additionally, there are no neutrinos that are FTL and the Opera experiment was flawed due to equipment error. A simple google search would have cleared up your ignorance there.
This is absolute nonsense. Read up on the Alcubirre Drive if you really want. That isn’t made up, unlike your guesses. You’ve also invented yet another bit of Physics that doesn’t actually exist, “dimensional theory”.
And now you’re just stringing words together because evidently it sounds neat to you. V = Fλ. Do explain how varying F somehow creates an “inverted state”, what the fuck an “inverted state” is, and how on Earth that has anything to do with FTL velocities. You do realize that the only reason warp drive would work is because it bends spacetime but the vessel does not actually accelerate to, let alone past, C? Do you really not understand that anything with mass simply cannot possibly accelerate to C, and certainly not beyond?
No, they wouldn’t. They would be quite comfortable in their inertial frame of reference. You’ve also made up yet another bit of nonsense, “time insulation”.
Where are you even getting this bullshit? Do you really not know that spacetime is one thing, and you can no more ‘insulate’ against time than you can against space?
Another nonsense phrase you’ve invented.
No, not “technically”, not actually, not in any sense of the word. Please read up on Relativity. I’m also fairly certain that you’ve imagined “nervous system shock”.
This is simply bullshit. I’m not even sure where to begin, as you’re obviously just saying gobbledygook that sounds neat to you. Where did you even get this ridiculous pablum?
I disagree, your running under the assumption that everything we know so far about physics and the other things as being right. You don’t see the universe as open source ripe with multiple interpretations, though i can see why you’d disagree with mine.
The jargon i use is not scientific, your right, but if you can’t see what I’m saying using that jargon, you are obviously not into theoretical physics. I’m not going to spend 10 years and piles of cash to get a degree within something I don’t think is the basis of all true understanding.
If you don’t want to “try” to see any of my theories as being based in reality that’s fine. What I am saying is that the solution to the universe and it’s orderly chaos is not going to be found with numbers or extrapolation.
I’m wrong. Its not Beckett, it’s Gurdjieff, and his idea that we cannot trust anything that has gone before and must always, always rebuild everything from scratch. If I haven’t gotten very far, it’s because the shoulders of giants have dandruff.
Nah, Gurdjieff was a genius.
*you’re
Or accurate. Or descriptive. Or relevant.
Your argument is Not Even Wrong.
As pointed out, you simply made stuff up and decided to call it an argument. Your argument isn’t grounded in Physics, it’s grounded in fantasy.
Actually, I pointed out how Physics shows that each and every single claim you made was bullshit. But please, do educate me on Physics.
Why would I try to do something so absurd, when they’re obviously something that most college kids would’ve/could’ve come up with after taking one too many bong hits? You can’t just make shit up and then ask people to “try” to see how they’re based in reality, when reality shows that your ramblings are bullshit.
Speaking of all the bullshit you’ve posted: give proof or retract.
Yes. It’s down the hallway, 2nd door on the left.
That was… Wow.
I meant to quote this. Holy balls, that is weird.
Facts are true, even if you don’t believe in them.
Reality, while subjective, does not objectively become different if you choose a different interpretation of it. Electrons are still electrons and follow established laws of behavior. The Earth still revolves around the Sun which revolves around the Milky Way. Birds still exist.
And babbling incoherently while refusing to debate, discuss or even acknowledge views contrary to your theories does not make this a “discussion”, or you ‘deep’ (or even ‘misunderstood’).
It’s not grounded at all. But at least it’s not an actual argument.
Hmmm… can something be grounded in a vacuum? Something more for the OP to ponder.
Marley, I nearly pissed myself laughing 
We done Loganberries!
I posited these questions to my discounted can of Spaghetti-Os and got the following:
ooOoOOmeatballooOOmeatbaloooOOOOmetballmeatballOOOOoooospoonfulofbasicallyketchupwater
I was unable to decipher the code. The universe retains it’s secrets once again. Unless CERN has an answer for Dr. Boyardee’s theorems. My sample was indeed subject to microwaves for approximately 2 minutes at standard ATP.
I had no crucibles at hand and used a common ceramic bowl as the reaction vessel, and consumed the resulting solution with an alloy aluminum concave scoop known commonly as a spoon. The resulting fecal output is still in process. An empirical, quantitative and qualitative assay of said fecal sample is not planned as the department in charge of said analysis (hehe anal) has concluded that “poo is gross”.
Conclusion: If there are any Mindless Perspectives that people mutilate simultaneously, the results cannot be found in the fecal remnants of Campbells (formerly Franco-American) Spaghetti-os with meatballs waste material. Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? Yes, of course it is.