Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer convicted of murdering George Floyd, pleaded guilty Wednesday to separate federal charges that he violated Floyd’s civil rights.
As part of a plea deal, Chauvin pleaded guilty to one count of violating Floyd’s civil rights and to one count of violating the rights of a 14-year-old in a separate case. Prosecutors said other related charges to those cases would be dismissed.
Thus essentially no additional punishment for the federal crimes, since the sentence is to be served concurrently.
Isn’t the guilty plea (which he probably to cop in order to get a concurrent sentence) going to put a big black cloud over his head in any civil proceeding?
Not necessarily (but likely since the city’s liability was primarily vicarious), but they got millions from the city and Chauvin is probably judgment proof. (i.e., poor)
The city either got a release that covered him, or the family will probably just let it drop.
He actually had fairly decent assets but he divorced his wife and she got everything in the divorce. Obviously this was to protect the assets. There is a separate case involving that and tax evasion.
Is he going to care? I suspect his retirement needs will be fully met by the government, state or federal, and he wasn’t going to stand much of a chance in a civil suit anyway.
I wish they wouldn’t do this for such a serious set of crimes. I understand the reasons they do it, it just seems wrong to me. It’s like commit one crime. get another crime free.
I think , as said above, he has charges pending for trying to hide money thru his divorce. Does anyone know if his police pension (if he has one) is secure from civil forfeiture?
No, the federal charges are different. They are all about violating George Floyd’s civil rights. That’s their jurisdiction and seems totally justified to me.
But the federal charges were more specific, including not getting him medical care and kneeling on his neck when he was already secured. It also includes another case where he choked and beat a 14 year old with his flashlight.
I think civil rights violations are very important to prosecute when they are being violated by members of the government. Sometimes civil rights cases are the only way police officers are punished at all, since local prosecutors and juries have a long track record of not prosecuting police for their crimes.
I read there was no parole in the federal system. Is “good time” different from parole?