OK… my $.02
Minorities are created by the majority.
What does that mean? you may ask…
I’ll tell you, I say.
If we define the majority as those people guaranteed full participation and emersion in the culture, the “minorities” are those people who are excluded from that culture. Minorities, excluded from the predominant culture, will go on to form their own culture.
In our culture, the majority at some point along the line had chosen some arbitrary characteristic that, when present in an individual, excluded that individual from full participation and emersion in the predominant culture. This exclusion can be systemic and formal (in the case of slavery and Jim Crow laws) or casual and informal (such as a general attitude or misconception). It does not have to be written into law, but it can be. It just has to be that at some point in history, a group of individuals was denied full participation in the culture due to an arbitrary characteristic. All people seek participation in a culture. If denied participation in one culture, a people will form their own culture.
The next point is one people often miss: Even if the causes for the exclusion are removed, the culture that was formed because of it does NOT disappear. Thus, even though there is no more slavery, and their are laws protecting blacks from discrimination, there is still an African-American culture that is seperate and distinct from the standard American culture. Cultures, once formed, are extremely stable things.
Thus, we have minorities. Skin color is one arbitrary characteristic that seems obvious. Linguistic heritage is another. Why are people whose ancestors spoke Western Hemisphere dialects of Spanish denied full participation in the majority culture, but those whose ancestors spoke German or French not? By denying Hispanic-Americans full access to the American culture, the minority culture of Hispanic-Americans formed. Since no such exclusion occured for Franco-Americans, there is no minority class of Franco-Americans.
To quote V.I. Lenin: “What is to be done?” How do we guarantee full rights and privilages to people in a way that does not seek to eradicate their culture? People are necissarily defensive when measures are proposed that can lead to the eradication of a way of life they have always known. But we also seek equality and liberty for all people in the U.S. How do we reconcile these issues? It may take a bigger person than I to answer these questions.
Jason R Remy
“Open mindedness is not the same thing as empty mindedness.”
– John Dewey Democracy and Education (1916)