When Mirsky closed down WOTW, folks in my office debated whether it would always be remembered as an early web cultural phenomenon, or quickly fade from collective memory.
OK, time for a quick poll:
a) My web site made Worst of the Web
b) Cried when he closed up shop
c) Used to browse WOTW now and then
d) Didn’t go there but knew what it was
e) Heard about it somewhere
f) What the hell was it?
There is a Steve Mirsky that writes an column for Scientific American entitled “Anti-Gravity”. Is this the same guy? I was under the impression that Mirsky left WOTW to pursue legitimate journalism.
Sorry, Democritus, no mirrors available. Or possible. You see, he’d award “Worst of the Web” to highly deserving web sites, many of which would change within a matter of days after the notoriety brought their attention to what they had going on-line. If you could see his old site now, the links to the sites of which he made fun would mostly be dead links.
b, cried when he closed up shop. He once picked a page that I suggested to him, a page that had a list of UFO-conspiracy stuff, plus a few links to “How to pick up chicks” at the bottom. My comment: “Gee, who woulda thought UFO conspiracy theorists would have trouble meeting girls!”
I believe I still have my copy of the one-shot Mirsky newsletter that he e-mailed to interested parties; I’ll find and post it if there’s interest.
Didn’t he briefly have some free business plans posted for a while? Ideas that he just wanted to see someone try to make a profit at.
Value-porn springs to mind. repackaging the less popular porn on the web in a quantity-not-quality sort of way.
There is an urgent need for Mirsky these days. No one who tried a “worst of the web” was so good at picking them out and being able to say exactly the right things about them. He didn’t comment to prove his superiority; he let the pages speak for themselves.