Although I’m intrigued by the concept of a non-XXX misogynistic movie with a woman in the lead. Usually the male gaze is transmitted through a male avatar, like Sean Connery or Clint Eastwood.
You don’t really want my opinion. That’s clear. You want me to stumble around and make my objections so you can mansplain to me how ignorant my little female brain is.
You are not ignorant. You are not being “mansplained” to.
You are being shown a different view. You can agree with it, or disagree. Either is fine.
You appear to disagree. More power to you, I like strong opinions. (We have a saying in software dev, “strong opinions, weakly held” which is support for having a good argument but willing to consider closely the opposing argument and accept it, if it is better)
Fobbing this off on “mansplaining” is weak at best, and (ironically) chauvinistic.
You can play the “mansplaining” victimhood card all you want, it doesn’t make your views any more valid, and it doesn’t make them feminist.
@Babale can speak for himself of course, but I don’t think my fallible efforts to be a feminist ally are enhanced by pandering to regressive anti-feminist views just because they are espoused by a woman.
Oh okay.
I’ll go back in my corner and hide. And you males can all tell those who’ll listen why a woman(me, who doesn’t like confrontation) has weak arguments.
And why they should see this weird movie.
Because, hoo baby she fucks every man and woman on screen. Yay! It was hard to watch, but man oh man I hung on to the end. Cause, reasons, ya know! .
I have just been talked outta looking at this movie. Thanks.
In what actually IS a shocking display of misogyny, I am having a real hard time finding a picture of a woman carrying a cross.
There are tons of images of men carrying crosses, dressed in all kinds of attire, including some Medieval paintings of Jesus in what can only be described as a dress. (I note this because until I noticed the mustache I thought I had found what I was looking for).
But there are only a handful of women carrying crosses, even when that is what I search for, and the vast majority of those images I don’t want to use because the woman is inexplicably topless? (I guess they’re going for the Jesus in rags with a crown of thorns cosplay look?) Considering the subject matter, it feels far too fan-service-y.
I’m sorry, i am totally missing how your reply even relates to what i wrote.
Misinterpreting a poster to make her views sound extreme and foolish is only meaningful if she’s talking about a movie that people want to ban? Huh? Telling someone they can’t have a strong opinion about whether they want to see a movie unless they have seen the movie is only okay if people are trying to ban the movie? Help me here. How are those attacks not attacks?
I think you get three kinds of results. Jesus religious art, ironic satire revolving around the expression, and religious nutjobs raising awareness for a cause by dragging a giant cross (often on wheels, which seems like cheating )
When it comes to men, you see both kinds of artistic images in all types of formats. Cartoons, clip art, corporate looking stock images, etc. And then you see photos of real guys roaming the streets with crosses.
In the first few pages of Google results when searching for “woman carrying cross”, I got lots of results showing men carrying crosses; but when it comes to women, I got very little in the way of ironic depictions of the expression “her cross to bear”; I got one or two pictures of women carrying crosses around for a cause; and I got a handful of what can only be described as “cosplay Jesus”, a photograph of a woman carrying a cross while dressed in rags/with a thorn crown (and often topless, though I have safe search on so nothing is explicit, thank God).
It feels like the strangest genre of cosplay ever.