<Hijack> If you read my previous post carefully, you will notice I stated the pro-life position without saying it was mine, and followed it up with “If I were a pro-lifer. . . .” I AM NOT A PRO-LIFER. I was on the fence at one point in college, wrote a paper on the subject to make up my mind, ended up pro-choice (mainly because I didn’t want to force babies to have babies in the name of morality), but I understand both sides, and the only thing I’m sure of is that anyone who thinks one side’s obviously right and the other’s obviously wrong doesn’t really understand the issue. <Rant> We’re not just post-fact, we’re post-opinion. People act like politics, morality, and religion can be proven scientifically, while evolution and global warming are up for grabs. </Rant> </Hijack>
:: pauses to breathe and sip some water ::
Yeah, he invalidated rape victims. 
I fold.
I think SA’s going to leave here angrily thinking liberals can’t handle the truth or honest debate. I wish we had more conservatives. There are a lot of them out there, and they can’t all be brainwashed, either. I even enjoy seeing an occasional racist getting pwned, not by insults, but by overwhelming evidence. It makes it obvious they’re not brave iconoclasts, just wrong.