This. As an amateur vexillogist, I’m in the words do not belong on a flag camp (I’m lookin’ at you, California Republic).
Also, the gold stripes separating the red from the blue looks off to me; white would have been better. The magnolia is fine but why 20 stars encircling it?* – it looks crowded. The gold star on top is also okay.
Is there anything more on the symbology than the sparse description?
The twenty stars refer to Mississippi being the twentieth state to join the Union. The gold star at the top is comprised of diamonds, which apparently have symbolic significance for the Choctaw Nation. The articles I read didn’t say, but I’m guessing that the five diamonds also pay homage to the Five Civilized Tribes, two of which - the Choctaw and the Chickasaw - have their historic homes in Mississippi.
Ah, the good citizens of Wisconsin realised that their flag fails good flag design principles: too busy, complicated shield, not distinct from other flags. Needed to be fixed. No doubt they got right on that.
Yes, the heraldic norm is based on the principle that those colours bleed into each other, visually, and thus aren’t distinct: “No metal on metal, or colour on colour.” (ie. argent (white) and or (yellow) don’t touch, and none of the other colours touch.)
"…CNBC did conduct a survey more or less along those line in March 2004, asking participants if the words “under God” should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance. The results broke down similarly to those stated in the email: 85% answered no (meaning they favored keeping the phrase “under God,” and 15% answered yes.
Public opinion polls have produced strikingly similar results over the years:
A Newsweek poll in 2002 found that 87% of respondents favored keeping “under God” in the Pledge, and 9% were against.
In 2003, a Gallup poll found that 90% of Americans surveyed were in favor of the inscription “In God We Trust” on U.S. coins. In addition to the 8% who said they opposed it, 2% said they didn’t know.
A 2004 Newsweek poll yielded 87% in favor of keeping “under God,” 12% against, and 1% “not sure.”
An online poll launched by MSNBC in 2005 posed the question, “Should the motto ‘In God We Trust’ be removed from U.S. currency?” When last I checked the results, 89% had voted no and 11% had voted yes."
So poll after poll after poll supports it, with numbers near 90%.
They may be different things, but they are of equal import. Money is not a god that can be disgraced. And the mark is not one that makes the coin hard to distinguish.
Both actions cause no harm, but just speaking out against something people disagree with. And I’m sure that’s more common today than a survey 17 years ago when the US was still in hyper-patriot mode would suggest. Heck, I personally do trust in God, but see the use as a meaningless slogan here as vanity.
If it’s done as an effort to protest the metaphorical defacing of the Bill of Rights, I’m all for it. It’s funny how some get more caught up in the physical symbols of our Republic than the values such symbols and the Republic as a whole are supposed to represent.
Note that he lists polls from more than 15 years ago, in an America of yesteryear. Now we are flirting with a quarter of Americans being godless. It ain’t 90% any more.
Sure, that’s not true, but it is a decent proxy to tell you that people are becoming less religious, and thus it is likely that they are less accepting of “in God we Trust.”
Plus, as I mentioned, we were still in 2001 fervor at that time, the same type of fervor that got that slogan in the first place. When you have an enemy who has a different (or no) religion, that’s when people try to emphasize Christianity more.
In other words, supporting “In God we Trust” was like saying “And not Allah,” even though Allah is literally the word Arabic Christians use for God. Allah was code for “that God which rewards suicide bombers with virgins in the afterlife.”
Thanks for that. The missing note the asterisk was pointing to was supposed to say the number of counties in the state was around 53 – I can’t be arsed to look it up again.
A website I’d found when trying to determine the symbology said that the gold star on top is, indeed, composed of five diamonds representing the five Civilized Tribes. I kind of like it.
You can blame the Civil War for that one. A lot states would raise a regiment* or three and say, “Great! Let’s send our boys off to war marching behind the state flag.”
“We don’t have one.”
They then slapped the state seal onto a flag of regimental blue and called it good. Some states even specified the proportions and shade of blue on the flag match the US Army’s specs for a regimental flag at the time.
*Regiment shares the same root for region – regere in Old Latin, “to rule.”