He wants to and he keeps talking about it, if we’re trying to explain why Trump might be interested in keeping Massie out of congress (sorry, the senate) then his motivation matters.
Also, I don’t share your confidence in American Exceptionalism when it comes to defeating fascism. Most dictators weren’t allowed to be president for life when they started either.
He wants to do and talks about a LOT of things. The overwhelming majority of them never happen.
At most, Massie would be in the Senate for six weeks before it adjourns, and in January would give up his seat to the winner of the general election in which he is not a candidate. There’s no scenario where a special election for Mitch’s seat has any long-term impact on the makeup of Congress and they’re not going to be voting on any major legislation for the remainder of this year.
Moreover, Trump does not dictate the standard of Motch McConnell’s medical care.
A reminder that this thread is about Mitch McConnel. Further speculation about Trump’s 2028 ambitions, or lack thereof belong in a Trump thread. I use “further” as @steronz’s original post on the subject of keeping the seat free of challengers pertains to McConnell but the back and forth after that really belongs elsewhere.
Again, no warnings, no strong admonishments, just take the Trump 2028 YES/NO talk to another thread.
FTR, I think the two legitimate picture posted were indeed authentic, but I’m also convinced that they were deceptive. Especially because someone felt the need to post a second picture that looked almost like the first, with Mitch just wearing a different shirt, one that I very much doubt he put on himself.
I’d be really surprised if Mitch was well enough to continue his senatorial duties, but I’ve been surprised before. Unlike most Americans, he’s getting the very best of medical care.
So, does HIPAA continue to bind health-care providers after the patient’s death? At such time as McConnell completely dies, whenever that happens, will his doctors be able to say “Oh, yeah, he’s been completely comatose since June”, or whatever?
Almost by definition, most people in the world cannot be getting the very best.
Another problem is that “the very best” is subject to matters of opinion.
I’ve read that India has the world’s best cataract surgeons, partly because of very high surgical volumes. But the patient does not get to talk to their very best surgeon, because if they did, volumes would be lower. And Americans would find that system intolerable.
As for Mitch, last I heard he was in a for-profit hospital. Generally – not the very best, although it’s another matter of opinion.
My guess is that, like most Americans who have insurance and are reasonably smart consumers, his health care is adequate.
The office of Senator Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., released an update on his health Monday, this time with a statement from the congressional Office of Attending Physician stating the senator has not yet been medically cleared to leave a rehabilitation facility where he is undergoing physical therapy.
So Mitchs office included a statement from the Office of the Attending Physician. Faking that would be a real issue.
Yep. The Admiral/Doctor is apparently quite popular on the Hill- with both parties.
Remember the Office is not saying he is a well man, in fact the opposite. He is not well enough to go back to the Senate.
Today’s statements re: McConnell’s health and progress are consistent with a stroke patient that’s lost the use of the use of the limbs on one side of his body.
“Simple tasks” is an interesting phrase in context. Stroke rehab exercises are simple with the use of both hands or both legs, but downright strenuous with limited or no use of one hand/leg.
Anything McConnell can’t put on witnessed video (cf. a press conference), it’s fair to assume he cannot now do. Speech is right out until proven otherwise. Sitting up unaided, not likely.