It should be duly noted that the announcers in question are Buck Martinez and Pat Tabler, who speak only in generic, vanilla-flavored platitudes. I cannot remember either of them saying anything insightful, ever. The radio team of Jerry Howarth and Alan Ashby is far smarter but they prattle about the running game too, though Ashby at least calls the Jays out when it screws up (or when anything screws up; Ashby is refreshingly honest.)
The baserunning thing just mystifies me. I have been to 4 games this year and two were lost because of bad baserunning - well, probably. I’ve seen another few games on TV that were very likely blown due to bad baserunning. I cannot remember the last Jays game I saw that was WON because of aggressive “making things happen” baserunning. Maybe there’s been one, but they’re way outweighed by the losses.
Of course it IS possible for great baserunning to win ballgames. Dave Roberts, Game 4, 2004, obviously. The Cardinals in the 1980s won games with baserunning; I don’t think the 1985 Cardinals even make the playoffs if they stay still. But, and I think this is stupid obvious but it needs to be said, you actually have to have the personnel to do it. Dave Roberts was really fast. Most of the 1980s Cardinals were really fast, and the guys that weren’t didn’t go off running like maniacs; they were handled carefully. BP did a study about taking extra bases a few years back where they found that some players were just incredibly effective at it; Rod Carew, as I recall, was just ridiculous, taking 50 extra bases every year with virtually no cost. But he was Rod Carew. Despite what every new goddamned manager says when they take the job in Toronto, you cannot just run your way to better results if you don’t have guys who can run.
The Blue Jays basically have two really fast players, Rajai Davis and Brett Lawrie, and Lawrie is a total bonehead who negates his speed with stupidity. Other than that they have guys who range somewhere between a 4 and a 6 on the speed scale; none are guys who should be taking risks. Trying to turn a team like that into a baserunning machine is every bit as stupid as assembling a team of 9-homer-a-year guys and announcing you’re going to have them become a home run powerhouse by having them swing harder. If you want more homers or more stolen bases, you have to put guys in the lineup who can hit home runs and steal bases.
I don’t know why professional managers and announcers continue to advocate this imbecilic “run like a nutcase and ignore it when it fails” strategy, especially when it’s not only proven to be dumb, but it’s so obvious that it isn’t important to winning. Last year’s World Champions were dead last in the NL in steals and didn’t steal a single base in the World Series; the only AL team with fewer steals, the Tigers, won their division. Meanwhile, the best basestealing team in the majors, the Padres, were 20 games under .500. The 2010 Giants were not a fast team… I’d guess the number of World Champions who were slick on the basepaths is no greater than the number that were not.
I don’t know why they’re so dumb about this, but I guess:
-
It’s just easier to make it sounds like We’re Going To Do Something To Win than it is to be honest about it. If John Farrell comes out and says “Look, we have what we have, and our starting catcher strikes out seven times for every walk and the first baseman’s a bozo, so unless we get some breaks things won’t go well 'cause the only things that matter are getting on base and hitting homers and we’re not so good at the first one,” people would scream for his head. It’s hard for fans to accept that in terms of in-game strategy there isn’t a great deal you can do that isn’t already being done.
-
In the developmental baseball years aggressive baserunning DOES work. In every level up to the high minors it’s a game changing ability, because the defense can’t deal with it efficiently. A fast high school team will murder an opponent by running their defense to death. So it’s something you learn for years, but in the major leagues (by AA/AAA, really, at least) the calculus no longer works. In the majors, to a nearest approximation, fielders basically don’t make mistakes. Errors are very rare. In rep league baseball going second to home on a single is almost always a good gamble because somewhere between the outfielder, infielder and catcher someone will probably screw the play up; if they do execute it correctly it’s the exception. If you do the same thing on a short single in the big leagues expecting a mistake, you’re thrown out by ten steps 19 times in 20. So maybe it’s a hard habit to break.