I caught the tail-end of a news report last night (June 10th, ABC World News Tonight) and, from what I gathered, openly drinking a beer while driving is either legal or its not being punished like it ought to be in Montana. Some people, including a congresswoman, were interviewed, all of whom lost someone or know of someone who was killed by a drunk driver in their state. What shocked the hell out of me was the camera crew and reporter were in a moving vehicle with a woman who was driving WHILE DRINKING STRAIGHT FROM A BEER BOTTLE!!! When the reporter asked her what she’d do if this were outlawed, she flippantly replied “I guess become an outlaw.”
WTF?!?!?! First of all, what exactly is the legal status of drinking and driving in Montana? Is it legal or is it illegal but the penalties are a slap on the wrist? Second of all, what is he rationale behind this behavior? You have to understand, I live in Cleveland, Ohio - one of our suburbs recently made it a no-no to talk on one’s cell phone while driving, which I support. Doesn’t matter to me if your eatting or chatting or spanking your kids, if you can’t keep both hands on the wheel and your attention on the road, pull the hell over! So you can imagine how shocked I am by this Montana story.
As a state, Montana has not outlawed drinking an alcohol while driving. In some cities, such as Billings, it is illegal, but that is a city ordinance and not a state law.
Of course, it is illegal to drive drunk. They just make a distinction between drunk driving and drinking while driving (which can be done without being above .1)
To understand this, you need to make the distinction between driving while drunk and driving while drinking. They are not the same.
The overwhelming majority of folks can drink one or two beers and still have less than the legal limit of alcohol in their bloodstream. Legally, their driving is not yet impaired. Some studies show slight improvement in some folks’ driving after one drink (due to reduction in tenseness).
Plenty of people drive after having a drink or two, not yet having reached the legal limit of blood alcohol. Compared to this, having that drink or two while driving has less effect on one’s performance (for a while, at least), in that the booze hasn’t worked its way into the bloodstream yet. Practically speaking, if it’s legal to drive after having had a drink, there’s no reason for it to be illegal to drive while having that drink.
The potential to abuse laws allowing drinking while driving is obvious, and most states have chosen to prohibit alcohol consumption while driving, with some even prohibiting open alcohol containers (including cups) in the cab. This is not because drinking while driving per se is a problem in every case, but because it has some correlation with alcohol abuse, coupled with issues of public opinion (witness the sentiment in the OP) and ease of enforceability.
The next step would be prohibition of driving after any amount of drinking. We’ll likely never see this in the U.S., but it’s the norm in Europe and Asia.
Driving while drunk, or significantly impaired from drinking, is a whole different issue on which all agree–it cannot be allowed.
The distraction factor is no different from drinking a coffee or soda, and while any distraction is a potential problem, there’s really no way we’re going to enforceable laws prohibiting any eating or drinking while driving.
Slight hijack – I’ve been told that Montana doesn’t (or at least at one time didn’t) have any state-wide speed limit enforcement on the highways. According to my information (my sister), the open road areas are so lightly populated, and the state troopers so few, that if there is a limit posted it’s pretty well ignored anyway. During the gasoline shortages, when the feds imposed a national 55 MPH limit, Montana (again according to my sister) dutifully put up the signs, but if you were stopped by one of the few enforcers, the penalty was not considered a moving violation! It was a “failure to conserve fuel” violation, punishable by some minimal fine.
Obviously, there’s a big practical difference between driving on miles and miles of straight open road with little or no traffic and having to maneuver the streets of downtown or suburban Cleveland, for example.
Sweden is 0.02. They wanted 0.00, but the breathalyzer manufacturers said they couldn’t make the machines that accurate (risk of false positives).
In a way zero tolerance (or close to it) makes some sense. With an arbitrary limit like 0.08 it’s easy to have people at parties drink their 2 drinks or whatever, and then fall into the “just one more” trap. The first thing to get impaired is judgement…
Do you have a credible cite for this? I’ve heard this asserted before, but all of the comprehensive research I’ve seen is pretty emphatic that it’s totally false. Anecdotally, I feel the effects of a single drink, particularly if I haven’t eaten recently, and I’m much bigger than the average person.
When I lived there I found that Montanans don’t take to restrictive rules well but that’s a GD topic.
IIRC Texas had a similar situation with no open container law and it not being specifically illegal to drink while at the wheel but don’t know if that is still the case.
Cerowyn: Here’s a page from a health education service at Michigan State University. According to it, the average man would reach .015 BAC from one drink in one hour, while the average woman would have .029. Two drinks in an hour would put a man at .046, and a woman at .077. So one drink in an hour would be fine for the average person.
Futile Gesture–mea culpa, due to haste. I should have said “…in parts of Europe and Asia.” Furthermore, while I recall reading of very harsh penalties (permanent loss of driving license, prison time, etc.) for driving in some Asian countries with even a trace of alcohol in the system, apparently with respect to Europe I was thinking of what I’ve read of attitudes in some countries, where driving after any drinking at all is “not done,” or at least heavily frowned upon.
Cerowyn–I don’t know what you’ve been reading, but I put “blood alcohol level one drink two drinks” into Google and found lots of stuff like these:
Duck, that is fascinating! I wonder, though, if the principle would also apply to more congested roads such as the east-coast interstates, turnpikes and parkways.
I also wonder if some of the younger drivers on roads with speed limits drive faster than the signs say to do just because they are at that stage of life where they’re looking for a rule to break.
Just as young people in homes where a glass of wine or beer with dinner is no big deal may be less likely to engage in binge drinking when they are first away from home than those who need to taste the forbidden fruit and flaunt rules to show how “grown up” they are. (No cite for that, just a “wonder if…”)
Quick aside: one of the reasons that say, Sweden has “zero tolerance” for drinking and driving is that in many European countries, public transportation is the norm. In the US, the majority of people drive to their local bar or tavern, unless they live in a largeish city.
GaryT: [[Driving while drunk, or significantly impaired from drinking, is a whole different issue on which all agree–it cannot be allowed.]]
But in the big picture, in many parts of the US it basically is allowed. One may be stopped, fined, even jailed for DWI. Numerous times, even. But eventually, these people almost always get their vehicles and their licenses back. A member of my family has had numerous convictions, spent several stints in prison (twice for over a year) and even attacked police officers who stopped him when he was driving drunk. He’s been arrested in at least four states. Then he gets out, they help him get resettled, get counseling, and get another job. Then he does it again. He’s been sober for the last two years, knock on wood. Oh, and btw, he lives in Montana (thought had several of his convictions in California).
GaryT: [[Driving while drunk, or significantly impaired from drinking, is a whole different issue on which all agree–it cannot be allowed.]]
But in the big picture, in many parts of the US it basically is allowed. One may be stopped, fined, even jailed for DWI. Numerous times, even. But eventually, these people almost always get their vehicles and their licenses back. A member of my family has had numerous convictions, spent several stints in prison (twice for over a year) and even attacked police officers who stopped him when he was driving drunk. He’s been arrested in at least four states. Then he gets out, they help him get resettled, get counseling, and get another job. Then he does it again. He’s been sober for the last two years, knock on wood. Oh, and btw, he lives in Montana (thought had several of his convictions in California).
You know, my quoting abilities seem to be pretty much non-existant lately. I could have sworn I’d included only the final sentence in that paragraph. Obviously, it’s absurd to suggest that a single drink would people over the limit. :o Sorry about that.
What I meant to ask you about were the studies that you mentioned that found that people were better drivers after a drink.
Padeye…Yes, not too long ago you could drink while driving in Texas. Then you couldn’t drink while driving, but could drink in the car while somebody else was driving. Now no open containers at all in the car.
I was in the New Orleans area a while back and there were daiquiri shacks there…I can’t see how they expect you to buy a daiquiri and not drink it in the car…it’s not like a drive-up window at a liquor store…AFAIK these were ready to consume, but I didn’t stop (not being a big rum drinker).
CurtC I agree…I almost responded to this thread a couple of hours ago with the observation that I could just about guarantee it wouldn’t be long until somebody would chime in that even .000001% alcohol while driving was too much.
The answer is, they are sold in the same type of cup a milk shake is sold in. Until you stick the straw through the hole in the top of the cap, it’s not legally considered an open container.
(I was in Nu O’leans during Memorial Day andb checked this out)
The cups are completely non-descript (plain white styrofoam, like a large coffee cup. No decal or printing on it what so ever.)
The whole thing still seems kind of strange.