Sorry bud, but you are a knee jerk whack job who cannot form a rational argument on your own and must rely on others for every single thought that runs through your head. You are to science what Milli Vanilli is to music. Your insistence to turn every fucking thread into a global warming debate shows your obsessive need to parrot a doomsday scenario so that you can feel all warm inside about being on the ‘right’ side and doing your part to fend off the upcoming (fictional) end of the world as we know it.
You have, simply, drunk the Kool-Aid and unquestioningly accept anything that fits your present obsession and ignore anything that doesn’t fit your gloom and doom fantasies.
And you have the balls to quote Richard Feynman who would, were the man still alive, call the ‘science’ of climate change a giant load of shit due to bad models, incredibly bad data collection and the down right terror these scientist show when asked to release their data.
Well, you just demonstrate that you are an idiot, the meta point I always make is that I’m not an expert on it and I also do mention that depending on an anonymous poster on the internet is silly, therefore it is what the scientists say that is important, and when Republican scientists are in despair for what the Republicans in congress are doing you are stupid to continue to assume that I decided to take many conservaloons on this subject to task just for their political leanings.
And I have the balls because as usual it is guys like you that chicken out, produce a cite for those bad models and bad data collection, after what the skeptical scientist Muller and BEST did when they checked for that mythical bad data (hint: they found virtually none of it being bad) it is really clear that you are still in lala land.
I was pretty impressed at digging up a Clinton-bashing thread from the Clinton administration, just to add his own one-liner. This is just the kind of break the Dole campaign is waiting for!
Why do guys like moonshot925 set so many folks off on this board?? I mean, why not just ignore him or her instead of enabling them with threads like this or merely responding to them in a GD thread. If you don’t respond to them, they will dry up and go away.
(besides, I’d say John was right…guy will be banned before the snow falls :p)
moonshot seemed to think s/he was arguing from facts at some points, possibly based on an ‘inherited’ hatred of Democrats, Bill Clinton, or anyone who is not an ignorant American Protestant of primarily European descent. I’m not sure which.
Some people, when forced to acknowledge their ‘facts’ are wrong can be brought forth into the light of reason.
Besides, it was more fun that arguing with the radio.
Actually I think** moonshot** is sincere, his debate skills are just really outclassed. If he changed his name to Hanlon’s Razor I think he’d stop getting pitted.
I would disagree. I think his command of facts is outclassed. If you notice, he is pretty good at slowly backing away from a position, without openly admitting he is wrong. He is also good at getting people all fired up about trivialities and side issues.
Ok, but if hes sincere he’s just stupid if he isn’t he is a troll. I know a few people that don’t admit when they’re wrong or change topics to side issues when they know their position is untenable.
I think trolling is the most likely diagnosis, in the GD thread on “Trusting historians” this clueless and clearly trolling bit was posted:
Even the mod in Great Debates told him that he was thread shitting there, if he continues like that I think that he will be gone before the month ends.
