Can so! I opened with Paddington and then full-handed it. See Parmington vs Parmington Jnr, Wiltshire Masters, 1947, as recorded in Mornington Crescent Openings (2nd Ed.) p. 231.
Yes, but in that sequence, Ravenscourt Park was played as a follow-on, a station that has unused platforms. (District Line station w/ Piccadilly Line platforms unused in normal service). Here, while ianzin mentions that same station, he does so as an aside, not as a play. So your comparison to the famous Parmington family dispute is simply not applicable.
So let’s see. Everything on the south of Maida Vale on the Bakerloo line is blocked to me. Everything north of Wembley Central is blocked thanks to you.
And if I play any line other than Bakerloo I set up a Haskin’s Heartbreak-type situation.
Clever clever. So it’s bad, worse, or worser for me.
I think I’ll choose bad: Willesden Junction. Vulnerable.
Oh, that was just COLD, Bricker. It took me two hours to run a sim of our current game state (using West London Unabridged ruleset, spring 2010) and so far there is NO sequence of moves under 4,000 that leads to a win. Off with your head!
Well, not necessarily. By the Anticongruency Principle, which was ratified at the Henley-on-Thames Interzonal back in March 2008, it’s definitively established that one mandatory loop is voided by the commission of another. So off to Dollis Hill we go, and as if by a miracle… we’ve also dealt with Scuba Ben’s little problem.
(Did you miss the minutes, Scubey? They were in the West Crunge Clarion & Dubious Advertiser - not exactly a mainstream publication, but their circulation figures do actually qualify; you have to watch those committee members though, if it hadn’t been for a late night fish supper I’d have missed that one myself and I shouldn’t be surprised if there was some jiggery-pokery going on there, slipping it into a provincial free-sheet on the quiet!)