Well, OK, Don, now what? Lets say you’ve convinced somebody here, Islam is a vile, destructive, and violent force in our world, and no decent people should tolerate it.
Then what?
Do we deport the ones we’ve already got? Can my Congressman, the Hon. Keith Ellison, finish his term of office, or does he get shipped out right away? Well, heck, then, might as well declare war on all of them, since we are already pretty much drawing the line. Why fuck around?
Lets see, gonna need at minimum a Constitutional amendment. Do we have to list all the acceptable religions, or just say everybody’s cool but Islam?
Or perhaps we should be more Christian, and tolerate their continued existence and presence so long as they publicly accept their inferiority. Obviously, can’t have them in our armed forces. No good reason to let them vote, since they are all obeying their Muslim masters. Kinda like how all the Catholics obey the Pope.
Whats the plan? I mean, if you are just going to limit it to spewing venomous slander on message boards, that seems kinda weak, seeing as how they’re the very essence of all that is evil. And stuff.
Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. 4:89
So you are a Muslim and believe in the koran? And your best friends are Muslims also that believe in the koran, then all I can say is you do and believe in much evil. You want to build a mosque in NYC, then it must be to celebrate your pleasure of having 3,000 nonbelievers killed by Islamic Jihads.
How nice, then you Muslims get to lie about it and say how peaceful Islam is. What a joke, there is no such thing as a moderate Koran believing Muslim, it is just that some have the guts to kill the innocent and the rest of the Muslim world supports the evil acts.
Here is the real story of building a mosque in NYC.
The disbelievers used to laugh at the believers. But the final laugh will be on them. 83:29-36
First you blow up our buildings, kill 3,000 of our citizens, then you build a mosque two blocks away to celebrate it.
OK, just so I know where you muzzies are coming from.
Don
We remove the religious protection of Islam because it is not a religion but political movements that clearly stand against freedoms, and stands against USA criminal and tort laws. Islamic Sharia law is 100% political, and in Islam there can be NO division of church and state, as the Islamic religion is the state.
This would be a good start, accordingly all Mosques would be taxed that would bring billions under IRS, and refusal allow any Muslims into the USA.
Then, because Islam is not recognized as a religion, USA citizens would be free to legally discriminate against them; accordingly this would place much social pressure for Muslims to deconvert to anything they want. And with some power packed education Islam would just die out as it should have 1400 years ago.
We do not have to round up all the muslims and shoot them, but they would be aware of the full social rejection and perhaps many will come back to sanity.
It is a plan anyways. We talk about the USA building other countries, well how about building the USA. You cannot have a free people that are grossly ignorant— it does not happen and never will happen.
Muslims are clearly enemies of the USA, any that disagree have never studied Islam, or they are brain washed into the worst cult that ever walked on earth.
Don
"Muslims are commanded to do and that is to kill all non-believers. "
That was not accurate at all.
Also you failed to point where Mohamed ordered the female mutilations. What he allowed is not clear and it is not the same, it was not in the Koran, and there is controversy among Muslims about those out of the Koran passages, in any case most Muslims do not practice this. Your sources are misleading you on this. So instead of just mindlessly thinking the worse of the Muslims, one should use their divisions and support the members that do oppose the mutilations.
Repeating that all Muslims do it is not helpful or accurate.
Don’t be silly. As has been pointed out repeatedly, this is an entirely different group of Muslims.
By that logic we should remove the legal status of religion from Christianity first, since it not only has that attitude but has far more followers in this country.
That’s just as ridiculous. As history demonstrates, the exact opposite would occur; religion thrives under that kind of persecution.
Ooooh can we at least make them wear yellow crescents on their jackets ?! Please ? Pretty please ?!
True. The only way to make people free is to forbid them from practising the religion they want, or from using the buildings they own as they damn well please.
Here is more proof that Islam is political to the bone and does not live up to the standards of a religion, accordingly Islam should have no religious protection under USA laws. http://www.answering-islam.org/NonMuslims/index.htm
As far as I am concerned this thread is closed, there is nothing left to say other than to start calling names. Accordingly you are wasting your time responding to anything I have posted as I am not going to answer you.
I have put many references on the table, and if you don’t like it then too GD bad for you. It sounds like you have a problem.
There is nothing left to say, and no more points to be made that I have not already stated.
See, that’s not how it works. You make the assertion, *you *prove it to the sceptics. If you don’t have a proof or reference for what you want us to believe, we naturally assume you’re pulling it out of your arse.
As a general rule, one finds that facts, figures and opinions pulled out of someone’s arse tend to be full of shit.
This is doubly true when your assertion is “this book says X”, in which case providing proof becomes incredibly easy : just quote the book.
ETA : note that a site that says the same thing as you, without stating where their info comes from does jack all as a reference - it’s just second degree ass pull.
Well, one name you’re not going to get called is ‘moderator’ so your opinion as to the closedness or otherwise of this thread is pretty much irrelevant.
Ah, a variation on the old: “put your fingers in your ears and go 'la-la-la-la-la” approach.
Of course, this isn’t responsive at all to my post. What’s the matter? Did my post not fit into your pre-canned responses? I wasn’t the one who said I know a good Muslim from a bad one. George W. Bush was the one who said that when he laid out our strategy of building pluralistic democracies in the Middle East. Do you think he was mistaken? Don’t respond to me with Koran verses. The reality is that we have troops on the ground fighting for the idea that Muslims are capable of building pluralistic democracies, based on George W. Bush’s idea that they were capable of doing so. Maybe you should write George W. Bush and tell him that he was mistaken for preaching that we had to sacrifice thousands of American lives in order to bring democracy to the Middle East.
Why hello again, (and no I’m not replying just to educate you) post 693 shows this is not accurate either, I did offer references. And once again, it is true that most Muslims do not consider female mutilation an order, your sources are not telling the whole truth.
Actually, since we’re not in the Pit, I can’t call you whatever I want. I will comment that your cites are laughably inadequate and you don’t seem to actually know what your are talking about - both with regards to comparative religion and US laws and traditions.
Nope. Trying to gain points traditional democratic values of religious tolerance, freedom and spelling.
Buddhist. Nice try. I’m sure you’ll find some ill-informed trash to say about Buddhism next.
Did I mention above that you are not exactly a constitutional scholar? If not, let me say it now: I don’t think you’re exactly a constitutional scholar.
Anyway, you seem to have taken your ball and gone home. Good luck and God bless your little heart.
