I’m curious to see what people can come up with as the “most vile thing said” by an American politician in the last ten years.
Particularly wondering what has been the “most vile thing said” by a leftist politician with real influence, and by a rightist politician with real influence.
I’m a leftist…and I wish I could agree… Some of the things Richard Dawkins has said about religion are pretty damn vile.
It depresses me hugely that the American left has become pretty strongly anti-Israel. When a leftist compares Israel to South Africa (“They both practice apartheid”) I have to say that’s vile.
I think the left is less vile than the right. Sarah Palin pretty much clinches that debate all by herself; toss in Anne Coulter and it’s a gimme. (And what ever happened to Michele Bachmann?) (And I’m glad I looked it up, else I would have misspelled both her first and last names… Deliberate misspelling of people’s names is a trope more practiced by the right than by the left… “Democrat Party” for the win.)
Ohhhh, I dunno about that. Sadly, I think there are a lot of examples that come close or even surpass Asshole-Akin’s bullshittery.
First one that came to my mind was from Georgia Representative Terry England. In March 2012, during a debate over Georgia House Bill 954 - which would make it illegal for a woman to obtain an abortion after 20 weeks, *even if she is carrying a a stillborn fetus or one that will not live to term * - England spoke in support of the bill with this delightful anecdote:
He literally compared women to cows and pigs.
By the way, the bill passed.
And if you want another rape-related one, Tom Smith (who ran for the US Senate in 2012, though he lost, thankfully) compared rape to premarital sex:
Or! Regarding the Texas legislation that would enact some of the toughest abortion restrictions in the country (that Wendy Davis successfully filibustered, only to have a special legislative session called specifically to pass it) - the bill’s sponsor, Jody Laubenberg, while explaining why an exception for victims of rape or incest wasn’t necessary, said
To be bipartisan, here, I’ll also offer up Harry Reid’s racist remarks regarding Obama. It’s a great example of how someone can think they’re giving a compliment to an individual and unwittingly displays their deeply-entrenched racism.
In “Game Change,” which chronicled the behind-the-scenes events of Obama’s 2008 campaign:
What Reid said was just political reality. Some other examples were mostly being inarticulate and/or stumbling over words/not being good at debate. Politics is shitty business. I’d say participating is an acceptance if not embrace of vileness. If electoral politics requires analyzing and embracing vile things, that’s what will be done.
The Truth’o meter has a collection of the most outrageously untrue things politicians either said or that were attributed to them.
I must say, I find it outrageous that any politician who has twisted the facts as much as in some of these examples isn’t forced to step down. It certainly would in the Netherlands.
Sometimes they say vile things about the Netherlands:
Santorum said that half of the people who were euthanised in the Netherlands were killed involuntarily, and that elderly Dutch people wear bracelets begging not to be euthanised. He also said old people were afraid of going to hospital. The funniest part being they were afraid of racking up hospital bills, and then being euthanised because of “budget purposes”! Ha! Even if all the rest were true, we wouldn’t be killing people over hospital bills… that only makes sense in countries where hospital bills are an actual concern, like uh, you know…
Not the vilest thing said over the last 10 years, I’m sure, but pretty fucking vile towards a whole country. I do find it somewhat baffling that they never seem to have to come back to those comments. They don’t seem to do a little press release apologising. How do they get away with that?
There ought to be some sort of formula for vileness.
How about:
(willingness to harm others) × (politician’s amount of power) × (level of offense taken by the group mentioned) ÷ (politician’s ignorance of facts)
In other words, the shutting down rape comment, while pretty awful, loses points because it was probably made in ignorance rather than just malice. Harry Reid’s statement about light-skinned Obama loses points because he wasn’t really trying to cause harm. Comparing women to animals offends women and is backed up by power.
“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”
— Joe Biden, describing fellow candidate Barack Obama.
Often an accusation thrown at Dawkins and he is certainly damming on what religions say and do but he doesn’t stray into wild and inaccurate accusations. Some of the things done in the name of religion, and the beliefs that spring from them are truly vile but they just don’t like to be reminded of them. He certainly hasn’t come up with anything as horrific as the USA political right espouse on a regular basis (and the correlation between the views of the USA political right and fundamentalist religious beliefs is, of course, no accident)
BZZT. I thought of that myself and it may have been his intention, but … negro dialect? In fucking 2008? That’s the part that makes me side eye him. ¬_¬
Listening to the comment in context it was clear he was saying that he will never convince 47% of voters to VOTE for him, calling them a lost cause in the context of voting Republican.