You know, sterilization of this bitch may not be a bad idea.
http://www-static.kingcountyjournal.com/sited/story/html/178590/
The children had been dead for several days and she was too drunk to notice?
:mad: :mad: :mad:
Your linky no worky for me.
Worked for me, LA.
Damn.
Just damn.
Ava
For some reason it’s putting in ellipses.
Unfortunately it worked for me as well.
This is one of those cases where you really wonder what you can do. Bitch had 7 kids, is on public assistance, daddy’s in the slammer, so she goes on a bender for a few days, or weeks, doesn’t feed or care for the kids, and they’re dead.
Could you sterilize her? You would have had to a couple of kids ago, and could we really say she was a danger then? Take the kids away? Again, you need proof she’s a danger, and who knows what set her off. Even if she was a bad mother, you never think someone will just let their kids die.
The damn police came in, woke her drunk ass up, the first thing she did was go to the closet for a warm beer…
The whole story is pathethic. I should know better than opening threads like this one…
This shit is fucking sick. I actually can’t think of anything to do to her that would be enough punishment, and I’m running down the full mental list of torture. She fucking let her kids starve to death while she got drunk.
I hope she never stops crying. I wish there was a way to remind her of this for every day of the rest of her life. This woman needs to be put on permanent suicide watch. I want her to live a disgustingly long life with the knowledge that she let two children starve to death while she got drunk. I want it to haunt every waking moment and every dream for the next hundred years.
And to me, even that won’t be enough. :mad:
What about the fourth case, I wonder?
Washington DSHS is pretty ok, especially compared to say Utah or New Jersey. But damn. I hate it when shit like this gets past the system.
Finally got the link to work.
It’s stories like this that make me wish we were still allowed to wish death on people.
Obciously, this has been ‘big news’ for a couple of days up here. This is the latest I heard:
The woman was using food stamps to buy food. (You can’t buy alcohol with them.) Then she would return the food to the market for gift certificates. Then she’d use the gift certificates to buy alcohol.
Oh sure. A 55-gallon drum of chlorine ought to do the job.
Fucker. :mad:
What the hell can someone say to this?
How long does it take for children that age to starve to death? I’m just curious as to how long she must’ve been drinking before they died.
I’m guessing the newborn died in a few days.
Maybe the 2 1/2 year old was old enough to scrounge for food, assuming of course, there was food in the house to scrounge.
Ivylad made an interesting point…considering the type of non-mother this bitch was, these children faced a lifetime of abuse and neglect. Maybe it was best they didn’t have to go through that. Not that any child should have to starve to death because Bitch Mom is a drunk. There’s nothing good about this anyway you look at it.
It’s stuff like this that makes me hope there’s reincarnation. I want those children reborn into a wealthy, loving family.
Johnny L.A., can you keep us posted?
Update, including a photo of our alkie debutante–
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002092935_kentdeaths17m.html
Given the truly extraordinary amount of booze in her system, as described in this second article, I suspect that her shaking & crying could very well be the DTs.
Does CPS do anything right?
There’s cases here in Florida of DCF not doing their job either. There is no room for error in the job of protecting children, but do such various state protection agencies ever get it right? Or are all of the workers overworked and underpaid?
This is one of the sickest things I’ve seen in a long time. I can only shake my head at how sad this is.
Man.
Usually, yes. In some localities they are also undertrained, badly led, and even hired from the wrong applicant pool. But even where they are halfway competent, they face that:
If they’re lax, they’re letting children die…
BUT, if they’re aggressive in defending the child’s interest, they’re “out to break up families” and infringing on “parents’ rights”…
AND if they make a judgement call, the politicians will hang them out to dry if enough people picket/sue…
And if any fool could plainly see the situation was leading up to no good, they’ll likely be told by the Court that is not a legal grounds to remove children*, you need actual imminent danger. (*opens to accusation of prejudice as to what’s bad parenting)