Movies you've seen recently (Part 1)

The Guilty (Netflix, 2021) - Meh, far too melodramatic for my tastes. The entire movie filmed as a closeup of a dude on the phone has been done better before, Locke (Netflix, 2013) for instance, is a compelling film and it’s just a dude driving his car while talking on the phone. There were a few supporting characters here that seemed to be as confused to be in the film and we are just as confused watching them.

It wasn’t awful, but I am struggling to come up with a person I would recommend this particular film to. Maybe someone looking for background sound while they fold laundry?

Nightmare Ally: OMG! I did not like that! Me and my wife were looking forward to seeing it. When it was in the theaters some while ago she wanted to go see it, she rarely does that, but we looked and couldn’t find it anywhere. So we finally got to see it. Oooof! Slow, beautiful but boring and a downer.

Just watched The Nice Guys on Netflix, and really liked it. A kind of screwball comedy/drama buddy cop (P.I.s, actually) movie. It hit just the right amount of feels and laughs.

I just saw The Nice Guys again recently. It’s very much like an Elmore Leonard kinda story. I just love when that’s done well. I think it’s a little underappreciated.

I believe this is the movie that shows someone cover their hand, break a glass window, accidentally cut themselves on the broken glass, and pass out from blood loss. Total failure.

About time that happened in a movie.

You should try the original, if you can find it (it was on UK netflix for a while but has disappeared now), I thought it was excellent. I haven’t seen the remake so can’t compare the two though, so it might not be your thing either!

I enjoyed it in the cinema; the sense of dread was pretty palpable, you just knew it wouldn’t end happily (I don’t think it’sa spoiler to say that!). Good performances and looked terrific.

Nelson Munce: “I can think of at least two things wrong with that title.”

Re-watched Mr. and Mrs. Smith (Jolie/Pitt). It holds up pretty well.

I saw Marat/Sade and Le Roi de Coeur as a double feature. Now, that was interesting. Thankfully, I saw them in that order.

Nightmare Ally: I agree with the good performance and great look/production. I love Guillermo del Torro’s work, but the stories too often leave me unsatisfied. Sometimes too predictable, unreasonable, or going nowhere. This one was like that to me.

The Bourne Identity (2002): This is one of the movies that I when I see it available on a steaming service, or it pops up on TV I just can’t help but watching, which is what just happened. The subsequent films somewhat dilute the original, which really is solidly put together with great moments. Even the beginning is great with essentially no music and no long list of credits. And in a departure from what it seems like a lot of movies do these days, no narration or elaborate text. A great action movie that I went into the theater when it first came out feeling a bit skeptical about because it starred Mat Damon. Now of course, I can’t see anyone else being Bourne.

//i\\

I respect him and like his taste in stuff, but his movies are kind of overrated. Here, I’ll group the ones I’ve seen.

Good:

Blade 2
Pan’s Labyrinth
Hellboy 2

OK:

Hellboy

Below average:

Pacific Rim
Crimson Peak
The Shape of Water

I still wish he directed the Hobbit movies as they have a great story all setup in advance. I will check out Pinnochio when it drops on Netflix. I have not seen Nightmare Alley and don’t plan to.

However, he has a new show featuring horror directors making 60 minute mini-movies on Netflix. I will promote two of those directors right now since they have episodes that just dropped:

Panos Cosmatos: He made Beyond the Black Rainboy and Mandy, both great movies. His new episode of TV dropped today, called “The Viewing”

Jennifer Kent: She made The Babadook and The Nightingale, both great movies. Her episode of TV is called “The Murmuring”

The show is Cabinet of Curiosities and I believe these two episodes just dropped today.

Basically, Del Toro does great things and promotes great stuff, but his actual movies are only OK. Hey, my kids liked Troll Hunters as well(although its finale was trash).

My only gripe with Nightmare Alley was the foreshadowing; we know how it’s going to end as soon as we meet the geek.

Did you? I had seen the 1947 one several times so I knew the story going in, but looking back, I don’t know that I would have figured it out that soon.

If you saw “Last Night in Soho”, these side-by-side videos of the dance floor scene that Edgar Wright posted are definitely worth watching.

The original was a blind spot in my Noir education.

I finally got around to watching Three Thousand Years Of Longing. Which I thoroughly enjoyed - Tilda Swinton and Idris Elba are always worth watching, and I enjoyed the recreations of the Djinn’s stories, especially as they weren’t bowdlerized or reshaped to Western tastes.

But I knew it would be difficult to approach the film in an objective manner, as it was heavily based on one of my favorite works of literature, A.S. Byatt’s luminous novella The Djinn In The Nightingale’s Eye.

To be fair to the filmmakers, they caught much of the novella’s tone - the exoticism and fantasy of the Djinn’s stories, counterpoised with Alithea’s cautious, seemingly prosaic Englishness; his fondness for “the conversation of women”; her disciplined but intense life of the mind. And it follows the beats of the story - a literary scholar (in the novella, she’s called Dr. Gillian Perholt) attends a scholarly conference in Istanbul, in company with her friend and colleague Orhan; she buys an old bottle glass bottle in the market, and when she runs it under hot water in her hotel room, it opens to release a djinn, who at first literally fills the room, before shrinking himself down; he rapidly learns English and offers Gillian the traditional three wishes; and she, knowing how such things go, asks him his story as she considers her wishes. And his stories are true to Byatt’s depiction, even to such grotesqueries as Ibrahim’s fetish for making love to obese women in a sable-lined room. So far, so good.

Nevertheless, the film was the Djinn’s story, the story of his three thousand years of longing; for freedom, for companionship, for, indeed, conversation. He’s a charming but conflicted being, curious but troubled.

The novella, on the other hand, is very much more Gillian’s tale. Indeed, she doesn’t meet the Djinn until halfway through the story. Before that, the story explores her mind and heart, talking about her work, her imagination, her interior life. Her growing fear of her mortality; as in the film, she sees a spectre in the audience of a lecture. Rather than a threatening ifrit, though, she is frozen by a vision of a formless, decaying woman, an apparition of her own approaching senescence. Her encounter with another, possible djinn who leads her through an archeological museum (the strange little man who attempts to take Alithea’s luggage in the airport is, I think, an echo of this encounter). Her interactions with Orhan and his students.

And her first conversation with the Djinn, in the Istanbul hotel, is much more that, a conversation, than their interactions in the film. We learn as much about Gillian’s history as we do the Djinn’s.

Ah, well. Different media, different interpretations. Overall, I enjoyed the film; but I would have liked to have seen more of Alithea’s story.

And yet The Shape of Water was the one that won the Oscar for both Best PIcture and Best Director. It won two other Oscars and was nominated for nine more in addition. For me the most interesting about Nightmare Alley was its connection with the Narnia books (and, yes, I’m repeating something I wrote in another post). Those two books/series were written by William Lindsay Gresham and C. S. Lewis, respectively, both of whom were married to Joy Davidman.

A Zeitgeist kind of thing, I think, given the political environment (I agree with @Mahaloth on where it lands). There was much to like and much to dislike in that film.