Nah, no apology needed, JackieLikesVariety. I’m happy to get multiple opinions and various input on what’s going on. This is all, obviously, very new to me. (Oh, and thanks InternetLegend, I saw you posted while I was typing all this up, on preview.)
PEG stent surgery is scheduled for 9 a.m. tomorrow morning. Shoe is soooooo looking forward to it - he was in a pretty damn good mood all afternoon after being told it was scheduled for first thing tomorrow and what it would mean for him. The little #$%&* tried to yank out his nasal tube a few times earlier - lucidly, not in his sleep. He knew what he was doing. Little fucker.
OK, so the two acute care facilities. His parents have seen both, and here’s what I know as fact, plus what I’ve gathered from them as their impressions:
"K:" is in the same building as his current hospital, just a different floor and a different provider (they’re tenants of the same building).
~vs.~
"B:" which is about fifteen minutes away and part of a completely separate health care system.
Pros for "K"
- it’s about three minutes from my home and his parents’ home
- it’s in the same building, so to make the move, Shoe need only ride an elevator up two floors
- it shares doctors with the ICU he’s in now, so he’d have some degree of continuity (mostly the same drs. reviewing his X-rays and files)
- it shares labs, C-T scan facilities, etc. with the hospital he’s in now, so if he needs extra testing, it’s, again, an elevator ride away
Pros for "B"
- more staff, including (and this is a biggie) an on-staff gastroenterologist at all times
- bigger facility (better funding … ?) with more exercise equipment, bigger rooms, etc.
Cons against "K"
- no gastroenterologist on staff - if they need one, someone has to call down to the hospital that’s currently caring for Shoe and ask the GE doc on staff to come up
Cons against "B"
- a bit further away for us, not much, just a bit
- an ambulance ride is required to move him there initially
- a one-block ambulance ride is required if he needs major tests, etc. (at least, as long as he’s on oxygen) to the main hospital a block away from the acute care building (it’s a BIG facility, and, yeah, anyone in Dallas can guess that one, I didn’t change the initial)
Here’s a hitch: “B” also has acute rehab facilities, which is the next step down in terms of care level. We’re thinking, maybe, possibly, that the best course would be to have him go to “K” for the acute care initially, and then possible move him to “B” once he’s sturdier and more in need to occupational and physical therapy rather than, oh, say, oxygen to breathe.
As I understand it, we can’t move him to “K” or “B” for the acute care, say “nope, not the right place!” and then move him to the other. That’s a lateral move for care, so the insurance provider wouldn’t approve it. He can, however, move from one to the other as his care level changes/steps down so that’s why we’re considering what I outlined in the paragraph above.
I’m gonna rustle up a clean pot, make some pasta, read (I treated myself to the next Game of Thrones and now I’m so ahead of the damn TV series) and go to bed. If anyone has opinions or advice on the whole K vs. B thing, I’m happy to take them into consideration. I’ll post again tomorrow once I know how his tummy stent went in.