I dunno. I kinda think they would’ve been better off just letting him hang on till the next election and then simply not running. Now his VP has two years to solidify his position to get re-elected and then take Mubarak’s place as de-facto dictator.
Where did you get the “two years” from? I didn’t see anything in the MSNBC story about when/whether elections are scheduled; I’d assume that barring another annoucement they’d go ahead with the September election already scheduled, at a minimum.
Definitely a positive develpment; definitely not sufficient in itself.
My bad, I thought the regularly scheduled elections were in 2012. But in anycase, I think the chances for those elections being free and fair (assuming they still take place) would be better if there was no military backed incumbent.
I pray we don’t eventually get another radical terrorist state out of this. The Egypt / Israeli border would go up like a tender box. WWIII.
I’m old enough to vaguely remember the constant tensions between those two countries.
An unstable Egypt is bad news. I hope, somehow they can avoid this.
From the Al Jazeera English story & liveblog, sounds like there are a lot of mixed signals going around, with the PM & the information minister claiming that he’s staying.
I just heard an Egyptian general interviewed (retired; not a member of the military council, but acquainted and in touch with them) who said that he thought they would be working toward having elections three or four months from now–even sooner than September. Also that constitutional reform and planning for those elections would be done by committees including military and civilian representatives.
The radio station I was listening to said that tomorrow the protests could turn violent. At that point we would see whose side the military is really on.
On a side note, am I the only one when hearing the Egyptian vice president’s name who thinks of this song?