[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]
You’d think so, but the general tone of a lot of the other comments (particularly from Pakistanis) leads me to believe that it was legit…
[/QUOTE]
Hmmm… maybe, but I still think it’s too perfect in its paradoxical stupidity to be real.
I did like this one though:
Sort of “My religion won’t let me do stupid things to harm you, but only this once.”
[QUOTE=bbs2k]
I guess I should be more clear.
Are there any “SFW” or “NSFW” warnings/rules with Wikipedia?
I really don’t know.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve never come across one in all the hundreds of Wiki articles I’ve read and/or edited, including some of the most graphic and controversial ones out there. This leads me to believe they do not exist.
[QUOTE=Mangetout]
The problem with blasphemy is probably the effect it has on those who ought to be a bit more faithful. Having laws about blasphemy is really about the exertion of power over the actions of the populace, rather than upsetting a delicate God.
[/QUOTE]
It probably doesn’t square well with the faithful when Joe Infidel can walk around bad-mouthing one’s own favorite Deity and his crew with impunity, particularly if one prefers to see Him as more “all-powerful” than “all-merciful.”
I could see the henchmen being motivated to take matters into their own hands if, say, Don Corleone demonstrated a curious apathy toward being called a cocksucker in public…
[QUOTE=Czarcasm]
Cocksucking is a religion now?
[/QUOTE]
I’ve made quite a few guys say “Oh my God!”. So it just might be.
[QUOTE=Vinyl Turnip]
It probably doesn’t square well with the faithful when Joe Infidel can walk around bad-mouthing one’s own favorite Deity and his crew with impunity, particularly if one prefers to see Him as more “all-powerful” than “all-merciful.”
[/QUOTE]
The correct generic infidel name is generally agreed to be Steve, darling.
I see the google adds are shilling “Muhammad Ringtones” in this thread.
Dare I hope Google is next on the Islamic protest/threat list? I know they’re down on images of the Prophet, peace be on him, but how about sound-files?
[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]
The correct generic infidel name is generally agreed to be Steve, darling.
[/QUOTE]
Adam and Steve are infidels cause Jesus isn’t a…
You mean an Anti-Anti-Remove-the-Pictures-Petition-Petition Petition?
Internet to hard-line Muslims: Get off the Internet or prepare to be regularly offended.
-burn Danish flags
-destroy danish sheese
-pour Carlsburg beer into the gutters?
[QUOTE=ralph124c]
-pour Carlsburg beer into the gutters?
[/QUOTE]
You can do what you want with flags and cheese but don’t you dare waste good beer!
[QUOTE=control-z]
Internet to hard-line Muslims: Get off the Internet or prepare to be regularly offended.
[/QUOTE]
I would extend that to everyone - the internet is not yours. You don’t control it or its content. If you’re gonna get offended by things you can’t control, stay the heck out of cyberspace.
[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]
You can do what you want with flags and cheese but don’t you dare** waste good beer!**
[/QUOTE]
Agreed!
Fortunately however, he didn’t - Carlsberg is pish…
[QUOTE=Czarcasm]
My opinion? This is a disguised pitting.
Moving thread from IMHO to The BBQ Pit.
[/QUOTE]
Fact: that’s a bullshit reason. This is undisguised censorship. Yeah, I know, the SDMB is a privately-owned board and the management can do pretty much what it likes. Still.
And Mohammed rapes 9-year-old girls.
[QUOTE=rowrrbazzle]
Fact: that’s a bullshit reason. This is undisguised censorship. Yeah, I know, the SDMB is a privately-owned board and the management can do pretty much what it likes. Still.
[/QUOTE]
If it were censorship the thread would simply have disappeared.
[QUOTE=Mangetout]
..although the other way to do it would be to install Adblock in their browser and set it to block the images, or get someone else to create a filter blocking them…
[/QUOTE]
MohammAdblock?
[QUOTE=Two and a Half Inches of Fun]
Jesus is a cocksucker.
Feel better?
[/QUOTE]
Generally one must have existed to suck cock. Since there is no contemporary account for Jesus’ existence he may not nibble dong.
Mohammed however, was a real historical person. So he may suck as many dicks as he might like.
Which I assume would be zero, since they hang homosexuals round there.
[QUOTE=Czarcasm]
Cocksucking is a religion now?
[/QUOTE]
Can I get an Amen!
[QUOTE=TheLoadedDog]
MohammAdblock?
[/QUOTE]
That’s freakin’ brilliant. Just wanted to point that out.
[QUOTE=Lobohan]
Which I assume would be zero, since they hang homosexuals round there.
[/QUOTE]
Dude, how do you think he died?