Re the (obnoxious) comments:
I saw a t-shirt that said, “You can be anything you want to be over the Internet. Why do so many people choose to be stupid?”
Re the (obnoxious) comments:
I saw a t-shirt that said, “You can be anything you want to be over the Internet. Why do so many people choose to be stupid?”
Follow-up letter about the editorial in today’s Star Ledger:
I used to be sort of okay with allowing religous and philosophical exemptions on vaccines. But it’s just too dangerous so I’ve changed my mind. Vaccinate them or homeschool them.
On a related note, that fucked up congressional moron Dan Burton is currently holding an anti-vaccine hearing:
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml
Jackass.
At least Burton is retiring, and it’s not clear who if anyone would carry on his dogged antivax vendetta.
There are good commentaries about the hearings here from people in the autism community.
I go even further - vaccinate them period. But then, I am from a known socialist hotbed.
Nice follow-up letter; that’s one of my current pet peeves, that so many people think that science and junk science should be given equal weight and equal representation. No, they shouldn’t. A crackpot yelling about his favourite lunacy is not the same as a peer-reviewed, well-educated scientist.
The more I think about it, I don’t like the term “herd immunity” used in this context. It is certainly a scientifically correct term, and useful in an academic setting.
However, I think in a contentious discussion such as this, that phrase is actually counter-productive. Being “part of a herd” is generally considered to be something you don’t desire. It also feeds into these people’s self-image of being a rebel, knowing something that others don’t and/or being a victim of a grand conspiracy.
I suggest that we talk about this as a wall of immunity. Each vaccine given is one brick in that wall. Every person must contribute to the wall, or they are a hole in the wall. We’ve successfully walled away smallpox, we should be able to wall away many more diseases.
Recently I read about another disease we’ve “walled away”: rinderpest. It affected animals, which is one of the reasons they could get rid of it. People were more willing to vaccinate their herds than their families.
Has anyone else been getting a result too large error for the comments? Maybe that’s the universe’s way of saying, you’ve done all you could.
Because I’m sure the caller thinks that Offit is a bought and paid for tool of Big Pharma, deliberately lying to the nation to line his pockets, so of course nothing he says will ever change his/her mind.
The saddest part of this whole thing (well, one of many, I suppose) is how the OP’s (and Kolga’s, if I read that post right) book had to be written and published at all. Sign of the times, I tell ya.
You make a very interesting point. Wall of immunity - I like it!
That, plus the other method used to eradicate it was slaughtering the infected animals.
Heck, even in the comments for the editorial, some denialist posted a ‘summary’ of proven points, among them that LavenderBlue, Kolga and some of the more active pro-vaccination responders are pharma shills. Apparently accusation and proven fact are the same in that world.
The accomplished doctor who wrote the foreword to our book is chief of the Infectious Disease Unit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Dr. Offit has been involved in the development of a vaccine for rotavirus, a virus that can cause all sorts of horrible side effects in little babies. He is the author of several books on vaccines.
He cannot do book tours because of death threats:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/health/13auti.html
I spoke to Dr. Offit directly several times while we were writing the book. He is a patient and kind man who has done much good in this world. It says much about our times that he is afraid to show up at a book store while Dr. Andrew Wakefield, chief promoter of the bullshit vaccines cause autism theory, has no such problems doing so.
Incidentally here’s a study backing up my premise that giving journalistic credence to the anti-vax side is a bad idea:
.
And I keep thinking of the motto - Are you part of the wall, or are you the a hole in the wall?
Good grief.