[QUOTE=Obsidian]
But let’s say you are my friend. And you’re not in the cold, and waiting doesn’t bother you a lot. You know that when you say 6PM, it won’t be hard for you to be there at 6. You know it will be hard for me. You know that to make 6 with certainty, I need to be there at 5:30 (50/50 I make the 5:30 deadline, say). So you think, “Well, Obsidian will always be the one to wait, because timeliness is the correct behavior, and she should suffer because she is in the wrong.”
[/QUOTE]
See, now this is just crap. In this example, not only are you hyperbolizing with the “you’re forcing me to be 30 minutes early” thing, you’re setting your own expectations up for failure with the “50/50” prediction, and painting yourself as the victim if you fail to live up to your word when you promise you’ll be somewhere at a certain time. I’m sorry, but if you habitually force people to wait for you, you’re not a victim; you’re a thoughtless asshole. The whole thing just reeks of manipulation, the way some people exaggerate their illnesses to garner sympathy.
The whole “brain damage” thing is a red herring. It’s just not plausible that a large percentage of those who are frequently late have that problem due to brain injury. As someone already mentioned, there’s no magic gene that causes people to be on time—it’s one of those things for which you have to make an effort, some more than others. But for some it’s considerably easier, and I suppose more fulfilling, to turn the tardiness into a personality trait rather than make an effort to change it. “If I can just get everyone to think of me as ‘that guy who’s always late’, they’ll never expect anything more of me! They might even find it kind of endearing!”
Well, I don’t find it endearing. I think it’s fucking rude, and no amount of soggy self-pity is going to change that.