My glucosamine pills smell like burnt hair.

Actually, it’s worse than that. The only thing I’ve experienced which comes close is being downwind of a crematorium.

I was taking the recommended dosage, three pills per day, for about a month. I began to feel very crappy… somewhere between feverish and nauseous. One day I happened to sniff the open bottle and recognized the taste permeating my body. I discontinued using the pills, and I feel mostly normal again.

I hesitate to specify the brand. I’ve used other brands of glucosamine and don’t recall any of them having much of a smell.

Haven’t contacted the manufacturer yet. I’d like to have them analyzed by a professional.

Have any of you experienced anything similar? Could I merely have a low-quality brand?

BTW, the expiry date on the bottle is in 2009.

No worries. Glucosamine is useless anyway.

(I could email you the full text of the study if you want - just PM me with your email addy.)

In previous threads, like this one, the consensus of opinion has been that it works for about half of users.

Anecdotal, and probably placebo. The paper I linked to (and its citations) were published in late February of the year, and the very thread you cite mentions it.

As I said, useless.

You forgot the last sentence: “Exploratory analyses suggest that the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may be effective in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe knee pain.”

Well, yeah, but the man asked about vanilla glucosamine, didn’t he? And if you look at the charts, the rate of primary response (at 24 weeks) for the glucosamine/chondroitin combo was 5 or 6% above placebo, which was at 60%. Kind of meh, if you ask me.

Here is a chart.

The moderate to severe pain subgroup comprised only 350 people or so - about 70 people per category.

Please, let’s not turn this into a rehash of old arguments.

Where’s “vanilla”? I’m responding to your blanket assertion that “[g]lucosamine is useless anyway.”

Empirical evidence shows otherwise, but you misstated the research findings. You can dismiss these findings, but the research principals clearly identified a group for which glucosamine may be useful. More research is needed, but sweeping statements are unwarranted, at this point.

Questions I’m interested in:

Has anyone else had a similar experience with foul-smelling glucosamine?

Any idea why glucosamine could have such a foul stench?

Is there a way to get these glucosamine pills analyzed at a reasonable price?

Thank you.

Quite true. I acquiesce. The vitriol is from a long, painful time on the stuff and no results, then instant relief from a different chiropractor who simply gave me tramadol.

Duality, I’ve been on six brands of the stuff. No funny smells, ever, and Google yields nothing relevant. Unless you’re intending to sue, you’d probably get a lot more out of calling the manufacturer than posting here.

San Rafael Chemical Services has something of a reputation amongst those who frequent bodybuilding boards and routinely get their more obscure supplements tested. Email them for a quote.

ps. I still think it’s crap. :stuck_out_tongue:

Ok, thanks! That helps. At this point I’m more concerned with potential damage to myself and other users of the same brand than suing the manufacturer. I wouldn’t trust the manufacturer to give me an honest answer.

Glucosamine is made from refined crab and shrimp shells, probably not too hard to get a clean product. But chondroitin comes from several sources; cartilage from cows, pigs, sharks, etc. I can see how there would be a lot of room for different levels of cleanliness in the original source material. As the link below mentions, some material is now manufactured in China, with reports of less than sanitary practice.
Fromthis site :

Glucosamine – The glucosamine manufacturing process arguably warrants some kind of quality control. The starting material is shells from crustaceans such as shrimp and crabs. Vanson , a Redmond, Wash., company buys, shells and dries, deproteinizes, and demineralizes them, leaving a compound known as chitin, or poly N-acetylglucosamine. The chitin is then deacylated to yield chitosan, or polyglucosamine, a compound formulated into a number of popular weight-loss products because of its ability to bind fats and oils. The Pfanstiehl company depolymerizes chitin and then deacetylates it to yield glucosamine.
Chondroitin – Like glucosamine, chondroitin comes from natural origins, in this case the cartilage of cows, and sometimes pigs and sharks or bovine trachea which is otherwise sold to pet-food makers. These are put in vessels, digested enzymatically, filtered, purified, and then dried into a powder. The chemistry practiced in China is the same but tends to be carried out by seafood processors that have jumped into the glucosamine business. Horror stories abound about how trachea are allowed to sit in the sun outside Chinese chondroitin plants and be picked clean by vermin. Chondroitin is a polymer of varying molecular weight for which no standard exists. The Chinese product is generally backed by an unsigned certificate of analysis on a trading firm’s letterhead, making the results hard to confirm or query. Chinese chondroitin is certified as 90% pure, but competitors allege that in reality it tests lower, usually in the 80s, and sometimes as low as 20%.
So for the near future, buyers are advised to beware, because what is currently being sold as chondroitin sulfate in health food stores, drugstores, and mass merchandisers across the country could be just about anything

This isn’t meant to scare anyone away from taking Glucosamine/chondroitin supplements; I know many people who have taken it with good effects. But, use a reputable manufacturer, and don’t go for the cheapest brand.

Mr. Duality At the very least, take the product back to where you bought it and complain. If it was at a big megastore, they may just give you your money back, but, hopefully will be concerned that the product made you sick.

If it was at a healthfood store, they’d certainly want to know about a bad product.

There are three links to reputable manufactures and a consumer testing lab in the above article. Perhaps you can contact them for more information. Companies making a good product have a vested interest in protecting the market from poor products that hurt the reputation of the product at large.

so do i :wink: