All personal attacks and invectives. Short on substance; a page out of Hillary’s 2016 book.
I know it’s asking a lot from some of you, but please, dig a little deeper:
Deign: To vouchsafe
Vouchsafe: Reveal or disclose
At least get correct whatever pathetic little substance you can muster before using it to attack me. I’m not here to educate you all on grammar. This was Deign-Minus work.
What do you think this forum is for? Rehashing arguments you were unable to make effectively in the other forums?
Your criticism of Hillary’s video were “short on substance” – you’ve still failed to explain what exactly is wrong with the mix of ethnicities and demographics in the video, and what would be an appropriate mix that would eliminate such criticism.
No personal attack. Simply the note that you are saying something different in this thread than you said in the earlier thread and that you have still utterly failed to demonstrate why anyone should give serious consideration to your ludicrous use of the word “warfare.”
But…little Zeke isn’t ready for Hilary:
ROTFLMAO!
Hillary is not going to win. After the absolute clusterfuck that the Obama administration has been, the Dems could nominate Jeebuz and he wouldn’t win.
And really…this is the best you can do? Someone who got an American ambassador killed and then lied about it to the American public? Oh, and let’s not forget the emails, either. The only thing she has going for her is the name Clinton, and that plus three bucks will get you a cup of coffee. Gimme a break.
All those years of music lessons and this is the only tune you know how to play?
Man, those must be some powerful drugs.
Classic example of the bubble in which some people live. (It reminds me of the posters, here, who could not imagine GWB winning a second term when everyone they knew was clearly outraged by his performance.) Viewers of Faux News still believe the nonsense about Benghazi that has already been debunked by Republican led Congressional investigations, but they are only the hard core Republican voters that would never have voted for Clinton, anyway.
I have no idea whether Clinton will win the presidency in 2016, but I know that the rant I have quoted is simply fact free beliefs held dear by the misinformed and True Believers of the Murdoch/Koch propaganda machine.
I love it when someone goes this far out on such a high limb. I can already hear it cracking.
Looking forward to your reaction on the off chance (hehe) Hillary wins. 
Did you even look at that link?
Goddamnit, now all that Great Debates turd-throwing has found its way into the happy, collegial confines of the Pit. Begone, I say! From Hell’s heart I stab at thee! Repeat after me: Kltpzyxm!
I don’t think you can use that word in the Pit anymore. Or is it when you call another member a kltpzyxm?
I think the rule is that you just can’t wish Mxyzptlk on another poster, not even in the Pit.
No, offence, but I deigned your wife last night. She ordeigned my performance “deigngerously deiglightful.”
You just deigned the line, deigner. You better deign yourself, or you might just get deigned.
“…you lose, you get nothing, good deign, sir!..”
Yep. Liberals took them and elected Obama twice.
Drugs wear off. Conservative stupid is forever.