I didn’t read the book, but to me this speech near the ending of the movie was far more insidious than what is shown. The “prank” which killed the girl seemed rather lame, right?
Let me review a few plot points.
First, Annabeth is Jimmy’s second wife, yes? His first wife died of cancer and Katie is the only daughter from this marriage. Annabeth is a Savage and her gangster brothers view Katie as a niece but they are not blood relatives.
Second, Jimmy seems to favor Katie among his daughters. And for her, he quit
the action to be a lowly store clerk. However, the Savages proudly continue to work the neighborhood.
Third, in a very unexpected speech, Annabeth tells her daughters that their daddy is a king, and a king knows what to do and does it. This directly plays into the Lady MacBeth idea.
It is this speech which got me thinking. What if Annabeth is secretly jealous of the former wife and by relation, the surviving daughter Katie whom is favored? What if Annabeth wants her husband to return to the action and join the Savages on the street? She says directly in that speech everyone is weak but us. She says you could rule this town.
But, so long as Katie is alive, Jimmy is a lion with no claws. He is no king.
What if Annabeth orchestrated this murder? What if she overheard a phone conversation or something about Katie running away to Las Vegas with Brendan? And what if she knew Brendan’s mute brother would be abandoned to a mother who didn’t seem to care much for him? What if she was the one who duped the mute into killing Katie to stop Brendan from going to Vegas?
Think about that plot twist. I think it is far better and makes a lot more sense than some lame prank gone wrong. It is far more fitting of Lady MacBeth. And the complete coincidence of Dave killing a pedophile on the same night could have unraveled this insidious plot if only Jimmy were patient enough (or Sean fast enough) to dig a little deeper. Those are their character flaws. Jimmy is shown to exact swift revenge and Sean is slow and plodding with both an apology to his wife and picking up on Dave as a possible murder suspect.
However, there is big one problem. The boys confessed to the crime but did not implicate Annabeth. Why not? It’s too bad the mute was not choked to death in that scene with his brother who demanded he speak Katie’s name. It would have been awesome if he garbled Annabeth’s name but the brother did not understand. The friend who picked up the gun could have been helping the mute without ever knowing who orchestrated the murder.
An ending like this would be far more Shakespearean!