To be consistent, the title really should be redundantly stupid, such as “Sharknado 3: The Second Sequel” or some such thing. That’s what they chose for the sequel, and really, it’s a brilliant title, a joke on the concept of sequels in a movie that is itself a joke about disaster movies.
I still would have enjoyed a series of titles as suggested by my eight-year-old daughter, where “Sharknado” would have been followed by “Sharkicane,” “Sharknami,” “Sharkquake” and “Sharkalanche,” but that shark has swum.
Sharknado 3: This Weather BITES!
Sharknado 3: Alien Sharknados (A good crossover with another SciFi product) Sharknado 3: The Sharkinator
Sharknado 3: The Sharknados of Madison County
Sharknado 3: A Few Good Sharknados
Sharknado 3: Hydro-electric Boogaloo
Sharknado 3: Ragna-Shark
Lets not forget the spinoff: Piranha-cane!
But seriously: they should make the third one a “choose your own adventure” movie. Of course it would have to be a vote (by, what, these days: Tweets? surely not phone calls…) Majority would rule.
It would necessitate a lot of extra filming…unless they could reliably predict how people would vote. For example, at the one-quarter-through point, they could put up a sign onscreen:
*Tweet your choice from these options:
A: Sharks suddenly fly through the roof of a city council meeting, OR
B: Sharks suddenly fly through the roof of a “Miss Nude Las Vegas” competition.*
…that way, they’d have to film only one of the options.