As long as you don’t try to cut all the big pieces from one pole, you’ll be OK. For example, one of each length from each pole will work:
46+40+35+33 = 154 from each pole.
There’s not much opportunity for any savings here, even if you were making a bunch of copies.
Don’t just mark them all off at the beginning and then start cutting. The saw will remove some width of wood, maybe 1/8 inch.
As ZenBeam notes, it’s quite easy to make this work with 2 poles. The following scheme leaves you with the longest possible piece left over:
Pole 1: 46 + 46 + 40 + 35 leaves 1" (less 3 saw kerfs)
Pole 2: 40 + 35 + 33 + 33 leaves 27" (less 3 saw kerfs)
Here’s a gross simplification of the formulas described on the wikipedia article you linked to:
determine what the waste is for each possible stock cutting pattern
determine what combination of patterns (could be the same one multiple times) will meet your production requirements
calculate the total waste is for each pattern combination.
Which is probably not what you were looking for.
The reason the math looks so hairy is because it’s not an actual formula, it just states how the factors limit the possible solutions.