I was thoroughly enjoying my lunch-time read, when I come across a quote by U.S. Treasury Secretary John W. Snow.
He says,
Does anyone else find this politicking inappropriate here? This is a release from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, not exactly a partisan operation. I understand this bureau falls directly under the control of the Treasury Secretary (who has agendas) and he falls directly under the President (who has agendas), but this push for the President’s tax-cut bill is absolutely ridiculous.
Eh? Given the (over-)reactions of some Americans, I was expecting it to be in hot pink or neon orange. And maybe with Mr Jackson sporting facial tatoos and a nose ring. But it really looks much the same as the current design, which was a much more radical departure from the previous one.
It just looks…I dunno…European, with the colors and big head and all that. It’s just vaguely disturbing. I mean, my ancestors came to this country to get away from things like that (Well, that, and the religious bigotry, and the poverty)
Looks like somebody spilled bleach on a $20.
And am I the only one who looked at the date on the OP to make sure it wasn’t a really old thread, resurrected?
At least it’ll be interesting (briefly). The last change was hideous (big heads and all). Perhaps in a few years we’ll have a bill that’s not even an eyesore.
I heard the head of the bureau of printing and engraving on NPR this morning. The bills will stay relatively conservative, he said, because that “says” dependability and stability in the U.S. government. I guess if the bills are all pink and froofy, you can’t trust government.
That “USA TWENTY” in the wavy type looks like it came straight off a supermarket sale flyer. “SPIRAL CUT BONELESS HAM ONLY USA TWENTY!” Could you pick a more dignified font next time, please?