Or not.
Sigh.
Well, hell. I thought this’d be one more silly flirt thread that I wouldn’t get mentioned in. Instead this has the potential to:
A) Be really amusing
and
B) Bump a lot of old threads
Byzantine complaining about being forced to use the truth in his arguments (in a satirical way).
:eek: Wow. Now those are flames.
Some notes:
Posts are numbered sequentially. The numbers are up to around 1770600. Because they pruned a whole bunch of old threads, the lower the number, the less likely you are to get a good thread.
The first number tells the database which thread to display (by the post number), the second number will send you to the correct post.
We could probably work up a scoring system for this:
1 point for a 6 digit number, 2 points for a 5 digit number, etc.
1 point for a thread with Wally in it
5 points if the post stands on it’s own
5 points for a thread which Wally started
10 points for going straight to a Wally post
5 points for a thread about sex
-1 points for screwing up the coding. 
Stupid game!!
Thank you sooo much for making me jump right to a Jack Dean Tyler post right when I had almost gotten all that crap completely exorcized from my head.
(link not included for the sake of all that is good) 
I’m with you wolfman. Would have been happy to never see my subject again either. Landed on an absentee military ballot discussion thread. Tried to close it ASAP-hope the damage wasn’t done!
I’m choosing 1984 from the David Bowie song, cause it’s so catchy. Is it ok to preview to see where you land before posting? Well I will anyway.
Hmmm, a very interesting Aug 21, 1999 post about why women have orgasms by easystreet in Comments on Cecil’s Columns
Now my points. 3-0-5-0-0-5-0 A solid 13 points.
Well I must join in all the bottle spinning goodness.
Oooh! My turn! My turn!
Does Crunchy get points for jumping directly to a handy post? Or is that just too easy?
Hmmmm, Major Feelgud talking about crushing ovaries in this thread
O.K I’ll try again…
Second time lucky!